BlogTalkRadio Interview
November 2, 2007
Richard Gage makes an intelligent and passionate case for a new independent
investigation into the so called collapses of all three World Trade buildings.
Richard has been a licensed architect for over 20 years and heads ae911truth.org.
9/11 Blueprint: The Architecture of Destruction
September 5, 2007
Interview with Bay Area architect Richard Gage, AIA, about the organization he has
formed, "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth". Outreach
to architects and engineers; presentations to the public and to professionals;
the physical evidence of controlled demolition of the World Trade Center
twin towers and building seven.
• Jones vs. Robertson: A Physicist and a Structural Engineer Debate the Controlled Demolition of the World Trade Center
Gregg Roberts, Associate Editor, 911Research.com
379
architectural and engineering professionals and
1452
other supporters including A/E students have signed the petition demanding of Congress
a truly independent investigation.
We will post your name after verifying your A/E credentials —
and other info for non-A/E's.
Mission Statement:
To research and to disseminate the truth
of the 9/11 “collapses” of all 3 WTC high-rise buildings
to every architect and engineer
Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
Architects and Engineers are trained to design buildings that
function well and withstand potentially destructive forces.
However, the 3 high-rise buildings at the World Trade Center
which "collapsed" on 9/11 (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building
#7) presented us with a body of evidence (i.e., controlled
demolition) that was clearly outside the scope of our training
and experience.
In addition, the shock that hit us on that date from the repeated
attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to
rationally evaluate what really happened. We therefore found
ourselves relying solely upon the judgment of outside "experts"...
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth proudly welcomes Arizona State Senator Karen S. Johnson as a signer of our online petition. Senator Johnson, a 12-year member of the State Legislature, adds her voice to the hundreds of architectural and engineering professionals demanding a "full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7."
Senator Johnson states, "More than six years after 9/11, we still have not had a thorough investigation of the causes of that tragedy. I am so impressed by the research of Dr. Steven Jones, Frank Legge, Tony Szamboti, David Ray Griffin, and many others. My concern deepens every time I read a new article. As the evidence of controlled demolition mounts, my desire for a new investigation increases. I want to add my voice to the voices of AE for 911 Truth."
Senator Johnson's complete statement can be found here.
How did TWO planes cause THREE skyscrapers to collapse in ten seconds on 9/11? How were CNN and BBC reporters able to report on international live TV that World Trade Center 7 had come down in the hour before that happened?
On Sat, Feb. 23, Green Party presidential candidate and former U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney will be introducing Dr. Steven Jones and Richard Gage, AIA at this L.A. event! The venue holds 1,700 people. More information...
Architects, Engineers & Scientists
Examine the Evidence of 9/11
Physics Professor Dr. Steven Jones
and
Architect Richard Gage, AIA
Plus Special Guest Speaker
Green Party Presidential Candidate
Cynthia McKinney!
On December 18, 2007, a NIST subcommittee was convened during which members detailed the progress of their research into the causes for WTC Building 7's "collapse" on 9/11. Richard Gage contributed to the public comments at the end of the meeting. Below is the written (slightly altered) version of those comments.
Read the entire Info Item...
This official response was e-mailed and mailed via the U.S. Post Office to Mark Weitzman (certified) and the noted individuals in the CC.
Thank you to all for your support regarding this matter.
Note and FYI: Mark Weitzman's response e-mail regarding this matter that was forwarded to us last month is posted below our letter.
Read the entire Info Item...
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1.
Slow onset with large visible deformations
2.
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance
(laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from
the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
High-rise buildings
with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”
As your own eyes witness — WTC Building #7 (a 47 story high-rise not
hit by an airplane) exhibits all the characteristics of a
classic controlled demolition with explosives:
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1.
Slow onset with large visible deformations
2.
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance
(laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling,
to the side most damaged by the fires)
3.
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4.
High-rise buildings
with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”.