Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner

    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09

    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version

    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"

    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    Print E-mail
    Evidence & Resources - Key Facts
    Tuesday, 08 January 2013 19:19


    Information for Law Enforcement


    Welcome to Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth's Law Enforcement Information page. We have put together this page to summarize information you need to know. As building and technical professionals, we only discuss the physical and video evidence of the willful destruction of the three skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11.


    A special message from Officer John Meaders

    Retired California Highway Patrol




    Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has carefully studied publicly available information on the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7, including videos and  photographs, as well as eyewitness and physical evidence.  We approach these collapses as architects and engineers and we find the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST'S) hypotheses untenable.  We conclude that the official explanation is seriously flawed and scientifically impossible. There is substantial, forensic evidence that explosives were present in the Twin Towers and Building 7 and that these explosives destroyed the buildings.




    Most officers visiting this page were directed to it after first reading our introductory letter. 


     If you have not read this letter, you can view it HERE.


    To reach out to other police officers, you can download a copy of our introductory letter to law enforcement officials below and address it to them.


    police fax




    On this page you will find...




    What We Are Asking You to Do

    We are asking you to help us by forwarding this evidence through your proper channels, and by contacting our organization with your professional advice on how to further pursue this criminal matter.


    Contact us at:



    Material We will Send to a Law Enforcement Office (Complimentary)

    - We will send a specially prepared "VIP Pack" at no cost to your law enforcement office (upon request).





    How do I have jurisdiction over 9/11 crimes?


    New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison found factual and legal justification to use the resources of his office to investigate the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. He was able to establish this under the principle of nexus of jurisdiction, according to which, if any element of a crime was committed in a jurisdiction, law enforcement officials in the jurisdiction are entitled to investigate any and all aspects of the crime. Such elements of the crime could include phone calls made from your jurisdiction, or participants in the attack traveling through your jurisdiction and discussing the plan for the crime while they are there (conspiracy). It could even include the transportation through your jurisdiction of materials or devices used as part of the crime.

    As well, please consider referring the following issues to the offices listed below.


    To report the destruction of evidence and failure to follow normal investigative procedures by officials in New York City as part of the cleanup of Ground Zero:

    Special Prosecutions Bureau
    Manhattan District Attorney
    80 Centre Street, 6th Floor
    New York, NY 10013

    (212) 335-8922


    NYC Police Department Chief of Internal Affairs Bureau
    1 Police Plaza
    New York, NY 10038

    (212) 741-8401  or  (800) 774-3373


    To report scientific fraud and obstruction of justice committed by NIST officials and contractors:

    U.S. Department of Commerce
    Office of Inspector General
    1401 Constitution Avenue N.W.
    Washington, DC 20230

    (202) 482-4661


    To report obstruction of justice committed by FBI agents and/or other federal investigators:

    U.S. Department of Justice
    Office of the Inspector General
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,
    Suite 4706
    Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

    (202) 514-3435


    FBI Headquarters
    935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
    Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

    (202) 324-3000


    Federal investigations are over; state and local agencies are free to investigate and bring charges.


    Some members of law enforcement might be unaware that federal law enforcement agencies no longer have sole jurisdiction over 9/11 just because it was designated as a terrorist act. The FBI’s investigation concluded long ago, allowing independent investigators access to documents under FOIA that were not disclosed during the prosecution of Zacharias Moussaoui. Any state or local officials who believe that participants in a crime that occurred in their jurisdiction were not successfully identified and/or prosecuted as part of the federal response to 9/11 are free to begin their own investigations of such participants and to file criminal charges as appropriate.




    The Evidence


     AE911Truth's - Blueprint for Truth - The Architecture of Destruction (33-min. version)

    This is the 33-min. version of the original two-hour Blueprint for Truth - The Architecture of Destruction presentation.  Richard Gage, AIA of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth takes you through most of the scientific forensic evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the destruction of WTC was accomplished with explosive controlled demolition.



    Explosive Testimony


    Physicist Jeff Farrer is one of the scientists who found thermite in the World Trade Center dust. He discusses his process of discovery using the scientific method.

    Total Time: Approx. 45 min.

    Physicist Steven Jones is also one of the scientists who found thermite inside the World Trade Center's dust. Chain of custody of the WTC dust and nanothermite are discussed in depth.

    Total time: Approx. 30 min.

    Chemical Engineer Mark Basile is another scientist who found thermite in the World Trade Center dust.

    Total Time: Approx. 14 min.



     These and other experts are featured in our latest documentary "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" 

    The one hour version of the film is below...




    Physics - WTC7 Free-fall

    Physics teacher David Chandler uses simple scientific software to understand and show the free-fall demolition of World Trade Center Building 7




    'The North Tower Exploding'

    An examination of the North Tower exploding



    'Downward Acceleration of the North Tower'

    David Chandler's exploration of the downward acceleration of WTC 1



    WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Free-fall (Part I)

    In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at free-fall, but the cover-up was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged free-fall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. This video displays the brazenness of the NIST WTC7 cover-up.



    See the rest of the videos in this series at the links below:


    NIST Admits Free-fall Part II (5:40 min)


    NIST Admits Free-fall Part III (10:17 min)




    9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

    Jonathan Cole tackles the thermate debate. Can thermate actually cut steel or is National Geographic's 911 show correct?




    118 Witnesses: The Firefighters Testimony to
    Explosions in the Twin Towers




    View the evidence presented in our public outreach brochure



    Technical Articles


    Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
    Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, and others


    Why The Red/Gray Chips Are Not Primer Paint
    By Niels H. Harrit, May 2009


    Explosives Found in World Trade Center Dust
    Jim Hoffman


    Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials
    By Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley, & Steven E. Jones


    Mysteries of the Twin Towers
    R. Herbst


    The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis
    By Prof. Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti


    Scientists, Scholars, Architects & Engineers respond to NIST
    By 16 scientists, scholars, architects, and engineers


    Public comments on the NIST WTC 7 draft report. Submitted to NIST 09/11/08.
    Jonathan Cole P.E.


    Journal of Engineering Mechanics:  Discussion of "Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Center: A Simple Analysis" by K.A. Seffen
    Dr. Crockett Grabbe


    Momentum Transfer Analysis of the Collapse of the Upper Stories of WTC 1
    Gordon Ross Journal of 9/11 Studies


    Direct Evidence for Explosions: Flying Projectiles and Widespread Impact Damage
    Dr. Crockett Grabbe


    Lies about the WTC by NIST and Underwriters Laboratories
    Kevin Ryan - U.L. whistleblower - former Site Manager


    Physical Chemistry of Thermite, Thermate, Iron-Alum-Rich Microspheres at Demise of WTC 1 & 2
    Jerry Lobdill 6/15/2007


    The Destruction of WTC 7
    Vesa Raiskila


    The NIST WTC Investigation -- How Real Was The Simulation?
    Eric Douglas, Architect


    Revisiting 9/11/2001 -- Applying the Scientific Method
    Prof. Steven E. Jones, Ph.D., Physics


    by Gordon Ross, ME [1], June 4, 2007*


    Open Letter to Purdue President France Córdova
    Kevin Ryan, B.S. Chem.


    Jones vs. Robertson: A Physicist and a Structural Engineer Debate the Controlled Demolition of the World Trade Center
    Gregg Roberts, Associate Editor, 911Research.com


    Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses
    William Rice, P.E.


    Can Physics Rewrite History?
    Chuck Thurston


    Reply to Protec's "A critical analysis of the collapse of WTC towers 1, 2 & 7 from an explosives and conventional demolition industry viewpoint"
    Jim Hoffman


    NIST's World Trade Center FAQ: A Reply to the National Institute for Standards and Technology's Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
    Jim Hoffman


    Building a Better Mirage: NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-Up of the Crime of the Century
    Jim Hoffman


    The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True
    David Ray Griffin


    Another reason the 9/11 fire-mediated collapse theory is wrong
    Joseph Smith


    Popular Mechanics' Assault on 9/11 Truth
    Jim Hoffman


    Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?
    Dr. Steven E. Jones


    Proof That The Thermal and Gravitational Energy Available Were Insufficient to Melt Steel in the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center on 9/11/01
    Terry Morrone


    Report on Weidlinger Simulation
    Leaked WTC Blueprints contain 3D simulations from the Weidlinger report that contradict the NIST report of the Twin Tower's destruction


    Engineering News Record: The World Trade Center


    Bad Science: Keith Seffen And The WTC 'Collapse'
    Winter Patriot blog 9/14/07


    UK Engineer: WTC 'Collapses' Were 'A Very Ordinary Thing'
    Winter Patriot blog 9/11/07


    Explosions or Collapse? The Semantics of Deception and the Significance of Categories
    C. Thurston


    My Response to Ryan Mackey and the Self-Crushing Building Theory, "On Debunking 9/11 Debunking"
    by Chuck Thurston


    High Velocity Bursts of Debris from Point-Like Sources in the WTC Towers
    Kevin Ryan


    Response to NIST on Control Demolition Investigation Failure
    Crockett Grabbe © January 13, 2008 University of Iowa & SeaLane Consulting


    Response to NIST on Energy and Momentum
    Crockett Grabbe © January 18, 2008 University of Iowa & SeaLane Consulting


    Collapse of the South Tower of the World Trade Center
    Crockett Grabbe © December 23, 2007 University of Iowa & SeaLane Consulting


    Science in the Bush: When Politics Displaces Physics
    By Dr. Crockett Grabbe and Lenny Charles 9/08/07


    9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation Was Impossible
    Dec 23, 2007
    by Frank Legge, PhD & Tony Szamboti, Mechanical Engineer


    Dr Seffen Paper Proven Ludicrous
    by Mick Meany
    Feb, 2008


    Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction
    Steven E. Jones, Jeffrey Farrer, Gregory S. Jenkins, Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe
    January 2007


    Engineer Sees Evidence of Extreme Temperatures in WTC Steel
    Submitted by Shoestring on Mon, 02/25/2008


    The Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis for the Destruction of the Twin Towers
    Tony Szamboti, ME --- May, 2007


    The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
    Kevin R. Ryan, 7-02-08


    Response to “Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Center: A Simple Analysis” by K.A. Seffen
    Crockett Grabbe


    How the Towers were Demolished
    By Gordon Ross


    How NIST Avoided a Real Analysis of the Physical Evidence of WTC Steel
    By Andrea Dreger



    Other Information


    World Trade Center Blueprints


    World Trade Center Tower A Architectural Drawings


    29 Structural/Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Destruction of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11, June '09


    Republic Magazine — Evidence for the Explosive Demolition of World Trade Center, Building 7 on 9/11, Sept '09


    Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, 2009


    Thermite: The Smoking Gun, Sept '09


    World Trade Center Tower A Electrical Drawings



    Radio Interviews

    "A Firefighter, A Demolition Expert, and an Architect Look at Ground-Zero" with firefighter and founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Erik Lawyer; controlled demolition expert, Tom Sullivan; and architect and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Richard Gage. Streaming Archive Here.

    Guns & Butter with Bonnie Faulkner, Apr '10

    WBZ, a CBS affiliate, is the largest AM radio station in Boston. This interview was aired to millions across the East Coast and we consider it to be our most successful 1-hour radio show.

    NightSide with Dan Rea, Mar '10

    Richard Gage, AIA on Progressive Radio Network with Gary Null.

    The Gary Null Show, Mar '10

    MERIA - Internet Radio for the alternative thinker - Commercial free talk with interviews, real news and alternative views. (meria.net)

    The Meria Show, Mar '10

    Richard Gage, AIA on Truth News Radio Australia interviewed by Hereward Fenton. (truthnews.com.au)

    An interview with Richard Gage, AIA, Nov '09

    AE911Truth is attacked heavily during this interview, but they prevail! This station is the premier Radio News broadcaster in New Zealand.

    Richard Gage, AIA with Kim Hill on Radio New Zealand, Nov '09

    KGO's Morning News is the number one rated morning program in the San Francisco Bay Area.

    Cristine Craft KGO NewsTalk 810 AM, Mar '08




    Videos About Our Outreach Efforts









    "But Hasn't Popular Mechanics debunked this?"



    One of the reasons we frequently hear for why people do not look further into the evidence of controlled demolition on 9/11 is because they have heard that the evidence has been "debunked" by Popular Mechanics.   AE911Truth has developed a series of articles that exposes the fallacies and flaws in the arguments made by Popular Mechanics in the latest edition of its book, Debunking 9/11 Myths.

    Debunking the Real 9/11 Myths - Why Popular Mechanics Can't Face up to Reality