|Evidence & Resources - Key Facts|
|Tuesday, 08 January 2013 19:19|
Welcome to Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth. We have put together this summary of information that you need to know. As building and technical professionals, we only discuss the physical and video evidence of the willful destruction of the three skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has carefully studied publicly available information on the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7, including videos and photographs, as well as eyewitness and physical evidence. We approach these collapses as architects and engineers and we find the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST'S) hypotheses untenable. We conclude that the official explanation is seriously flawed and scientifically impossible. There is substantial, forensic evidence that explosives were present in the Twin Towers and Building 7 and that these explosives destroyed the buildings.
On this page you will find...
AE911Truth's - Blueprint for Truth - The Architecture of Destruction (33-min. version)
These and other experts are featured in our latest documentary "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out"
The one hour version of the film is below...
Physics - WTC7 Free-fall
'The North Tower Exploding'
An examination of the North Tower exploding
'Downward Acceleration of the North Tower'
David Chandler's exploration of the downward acceleration of WTC 1
WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Free-fall (Part I)
In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at free-fall, but the cover-up was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged free-fall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. This video displays the brazenness of the NIST WTC7 cover-up.
See the rest of the videos in this series at the links below:
9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
Jonathan Cole tackles the thermate debate. Can thermate actually cut steel or is National Geographic's 911 show correct?
118 Witnesses: The Firefighters Testimony to
View the evidence presented in our public outreach brochure
• Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
• Why The Red/Gray Chips Are Not Primer Paint
• Explosives Found in World Trade Center Dust
• Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials
• Mysteries of the Twin Towers
• The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis
• Scientists, Scholars, Architects & Engineers respond to NIST
• Public comments on the NIST WTC 7 draft report. Submitted to NIST 09/11/08.
• Journal of Engineering Mechanics: Discussion of "Progressive Collapse of the World Trade Center: A Simple Analysis" by K.A. Seffen
• Momentum Transfer Analysis of the Collapse of the Upper Stories of WTC 1
• Direct Evidence for Explosions: Flying Projectiles and Widespread Impact Damage
• Lies about the WTC by NIST and Underwriters Laboratories
• Physical Chemistry of Thermite, Thermate, Iron-Alum-Rich Microspheres at Demise of WTC 1 & 2
• The Destruction of WTC 7
• The NIST WTC Investigation -- How Real Was The Simulation?
• Revisiting 9/11/2001 -- Applying the Scientific Method
• DR. BAZANT - NIST's 911 FALL GUY
• Open Letter to Purdue President France Córdova
• Jones vs. Robertson: A Physicist and a Structural Engineer Debate the Controlled Demolition of the World Trade Center
• Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses
• Can Physics Rewrite History?
• Popular Mechanics' Assault on 9/11 Truth
• Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?
• Report on Weidlinger Simulation
• Bad Science: Keith Seffen And The WTC 'Collapse'
• UK Engineer: WTC 'Collapses' Were 'A Very Ordinary Thing'
• Response to NIST on Control Demolition Investigation Failure
• Response to NIST on Energy and Momentum
• Collapse of the South Tower of the World Trade Center
• Science in the Bush: When Politics Displaces Physics
• 9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation Was Impossible
• Dr Seffen Paper Proven Ludicrous
• Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction
• Engineer Sees Evidence of Extreme Temperatures in WTC Steel
• The Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis for the Destruction of the Twin Towers
• The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
• How the Towers were Demolished
• How NIST Avoided a Real Analysis of the Physical Evidence of WTC Steel
"A Firefighter, A Demolition Expert, and an Architect Look at Ground-Zero" with firefighter and founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Erik Lawyer; controlled demolition expert, Tom Sullivan; and architect and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Richard Gage. Streaming Archive Here.
WBZ, a CBS affiliate, is the largest AM radio station in Boston. This interview was aired to millions across the East Coast and we consider it to be our most successful 1-hour radio show.
Richard Gage, AIA on Progressive Radio Network with Gary Null.
MERIA - Internet Radio for the alternative thinker - Commercial free talk with interviews, real news and alternative views. (meria.net)
Richard Gage, AIA on Truth News Radio Australia interviewed by Hereward Fenton. (truthnews.com.au)
AE911Truth is attacked heavily during this interview, but they prevail! This station is the premier Radio News broadcaster in New Zealand.
KGO's Morning News is the number one rated morning program in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Videos About Our Outreach Efforts
One of the reasons we frequently hear for why people do not look further into the evidence of controlled demolition on 9/11 is because they have heard that the evidence has been "debunked" by Popular Mechanics. AE911Truth has developed a series of articles that exposes the fallacies and flaws in the arguments made by Popular Mechanics in the latest edition of its book, Debunking 9/11 Myths.