1,939 verifizierte professionelle Architekten und Ingenieure und 17,332 andere Befürworter inklusive A&I Studenten haben die Petition unterzeichnet, die vom Kongress eine neue, wirklich unabhängige Untersuchung fordert.
Recent and Upcoming Events Bring AE911Truth to San Francisco, Las Vegas and Atlanta
AE911Truth has important events planned for just about every month in 2013. If you feel the need of an AE911Truth presence to “light a fire” in your city, just let us know. Your support will enable us to visit your area and inform your community about the explosive 9/11 evidence.
January 11, 2013: St Mary’s College – Moraga, CA
AE911Truth rang some bells in this sleepy St. Mary’s campus with the help of a no-holds-barred activist professor
Professor Albert Dragstedt, from the Classics department of St. Mary’s College, asks us each year to teach a 2½-hour class in the special January session course that he has created called “9/11 Studies”. It’s all about what really happened on 9/11, which is quite illuminating to the students, most of whom are caught unaware. Many guest speakers have provided their insight, including William Veale, the attorney for April Gallop; Mickey Huff of Project Censored; James Hoffman of 911Research.com; and Paul Rea, author of “Mounting Evidence”. It is also refreshing to have a course in today’s colleges whose required reading includes David Ray Griffin’s “Pearl Harbor Revisited”!
The 95-minute Experts Speak Out DVD in paper sleeves is now available in bulk at rock-bottom prices
Our blockbuster DVD, 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, is now available in paper sleeves from the AE911Truth online store at bulk prices as low as $1.50 each!
AE911Truth has produced and distributed many DVDs since its founding, but none have had more impact than Experts Speak Out. After the Final Edition was released in May 2012, Director Richard Gage, AIA, and other 9/11 experts presented nationwide screenings of the video during a 32-city world premiere tour.
Experts Speak Out made its broadcast TV premiere on Colorado Public TV in September, 2012. It soon soared to become the #1 watched and shared film on PBS.org, even beating out the popular drama, Downtown Abbey. The video has received more than one million views on PBS.org, and there are currently at least a dozen other PBS stations interested in airing it this year. Others are likely to join the list, due to the active outreach efforts by AE911Truth supporters.
Geschrieben von: Wayne Coste, P.E., with contributing editor Eli Rika
Freitag, den 08. März 2013 um 18:02 Uhr
Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.
Will Amy Goodman Break the 9/11 Media Silence?
Is Amy Goodman part of the “silent majority” when it comes to questioning the official 9/11 story?
For a journalist, when something cannot be said, the silence is the most important story. Many people believe that Amy Goodman, host of the popular public radio and TV show Democracy Now!, is among the best when it comes to confronting people in power and asking hard questions. She may be one of the best, but her silence about 9/11 is stunning. For example, she has yet to tell her audience or her readers that nearly 2,000 architects and engineers – all verified and vetted – are calling for a new investigation of the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11, citing evidence of controlled demolition. That should be headline news for a journalist whose self-described role is to report on alternative voices excluded by the mainstream media.
Jane Pollicino’s passionate calls for justice helped bring millions of people into an awareness of the compelling 9/11 evidence
9/11 widow Jane Pollicino, a passionate supporter of AE911Truth, passed away on February 21 after suffering a stroke, according to Newsday.
Her husband, Steve Pollicino, died in the North Tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Her husband’s remains were never found.
Jane was an active member of NYC CAN, joining over 100 family members of 9/11 victims and first responders who stand side by side with the 1,700 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in calling for a real 9/11 investigation.
In 2009, she helped deliver a petition signed by over 80,000 New Yorkers to the New York City Council in an effort to begin a new 9/11 inquiry.
In 2011, she took part in the second TV ad by the Remember Building 7 campaign, in which 9/11 victims’ family members joined architects and engineers in questioning the destruction of WTC Building Seven.
Looking for a quick, easy way to support the 9/11 family members’ call for a real WTC investigation?
The new 9/11 Family Petition, sponsored by AE911Truth, has slashed the time needed to support our vital mission. It takes only 20 seconds to sign! In fact… stop… read it… and sign it now!
Do you have just 20 seconds to support the family members of the 9/11 victims in their quest for truth? Do you have just 20 seconds to support restoring the civil liberties that were taken from the American people as a result of the official story about 9/11? Do you have just 20 seconds to support preservation of liberty for the generation to come? Do you have just 20 seconds to promote a lasting peace that will come from the end of the 9/11 wars?
Editor’s Note: For more information about Tony Rooke’s court case and to find out how you can get involved in future efforts, send Tony an email. You can also listen to Tony’s radio interview on 9/11 Free Fall.
In an act of civil disobedience, Tony Rooke refused to pay a £130 TV license fee, alleging that the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks. Facing a judge Monday, Rooke was not convicted and did not have to pay the fine.
Rooke, a documentary maker who made his protest against the BBC in Horsham Magistrates’ Court in West Sussex, claims the BBC reported that World Trade Center 7 collapsed “due to an office fire, which, even the NIST Report says, fell at free-fall speed for eight floors in 2.5 seconds. That is absolutely impossible without a controlled demolition being involved.”
How to Handle False Arguments Used to Reject the WTC Evidence
Editor’s Note: New York attorney Dennis McMahon spearheaded the legal effort by NYC CAN in 2009 to compel the New York City Council to initiate a new investigation of the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers. If you would like to support legal actions toward a real 9/11 investigation, write to Gregg Roberts.
It can be challenging for advocates in the 9/11 Truth movement to get our message across to family, friends, and strangers alike. Even when we are able to find an audience not too distracted by electronic devices, work, or their favorite sports team's latest performance, all too often the responses we get amount to false arguments. By having ready, effective ways to respond to the various types of false arguments, you can break through the denial and have greater success in educating those around you.
Fran Shure, M.A., and other psychologists featured in Experts Speak Out explained why some people have a negative reaction to 9/11 Truth
Often, the negative responses to the evidence presented by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth have a subtext that could be fairly titled, “kill the messenger.” Why do so many people respond this way? As discussed by psychology experts, one explanation involves the issue of “nationalist faith.” What this entails, for certain Americans, is the steadfast view that the U.S. government is always “the good guy,” and that anyone not in sync with this view is “anti-American” and not to be trusted. Those who blindly cling to nationalist faith simply cannot entertain the idea that America’s leaders would do anything wrong.