left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    2,245 verifizierte professionelle Architekten und Ingenieure und 19,552 andere Befürworter inklusive A&I Studenten haben die Petition unterzeichnet, die vom Kongress eine neue, wirklich unabhängige Untersuchung fordert.

    Die Petition ist offen für Alle.


    Latest News

    Volunteer Spotlight: David Cole
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: Dick Scar, BSAE   
    Samstag, den 17. Mai 2014 um 19:18 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    Sam AdamsDavid Cole is patterning his life's work after American patriot Samuel Adams, who wrote in a 1779 letter to fellow patriot James Warren, "If Virtue & Knowledge are diffus'd among the People, they will never be enslav'd. This will be their great Security."David Cole had for several years been independently investigating the National Institute of Standards and Technology — making multiple requests for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) records to obtain information on the September 11, 2001, collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 — when, in June 2013, he decided to join the AE911Truth's NIST Pursuit Team to further that goal.

    Team leader Tony Szamboti couldn't be more pleased that Cole has brought his research skills and dedication to AE911 Truth's pursuit of justice for 9/11 victims, their families, and the rest of the world. He calls David "a meticulous and dogged researcher who has unearthed significant items in the 9/11 citizens' investigation of Building 7."

    Weiterlesen...
     
    Debunking the 9/11 Truth Debunkers – The Saga Continues
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: Chris Sarns & Carolyn Clark   
    Freitag, den 16. Mai 2014 um 12:23 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    WTC-topPaolo Attivissimo, a blogger and anchorman on Italian Swiss Radio, published an interview in February 2014 with Auckland New Zealand professor of civil engineering Charles Clifton on his blog Undicisettembre (Italian for "September 11"). The content of the blog indeed seems limited to the events of September 11, and Attivissimo states its goal is "conspiracy theory debunking."

    In his introduction to the interview, Attivissimo remarks, "Clifton's professional opinion dispels all of the doubts raised by conspiracy theorists regarding the three collapses and makes it very clear that for the experts there is no mystery at all."

    Weiterlesen...
     
    Dr. David Griscom Wins 9/11 Physics Debate
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: Rick Shaddock   
    Freitag, den 16. Mai 2014 um 00:00 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    Not a Single Top Physicist is Willing to Defend the Official Story!

    debate-smDebate: "a formal contest in which the affirmative and negative sides of a proposition are advocated by opposing speakers."Those who know the truth are the most confident to debate on its behalf. A case in point was the 9/11 Physics Debate. Behold, on the 911Truth side: mountains of irrefutable evidence; on the side of the official theory: pseudoscience and outright untruths. The oh-so-predictable result: no qualified takers willing to defend the view of the government/media establishment in an open forum.

    The Association for Nine Eleven Truth Awareness (ANETA.org) sponsored a "Physics Olympics" debate between two top physicists in the spirit of the winter athletic events in Sochi, Russia.

    Weiterlesen...
     
    Attorney William Pepper to OIG: "The Pursuit of NIST's Fraudulent Reports Will be Relentless"
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: Dennis P. McMahon, Esq. and James McDowell   
    Donnerstag, den 15. Mai 2014 um 16:55 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    dr-william-pepper podiumDr William Pepper speaking in Times Square on September 11, 2013 for ReThink911 eventOn behalf of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, esteemed human rights attorney William F. Pepper has followed up on his December 12, 2013 letter written to the U.S. Department of Commerce Office of the Inspector General (OIG), demanding that the National Institute of Standards and Technology ("NIST"), a non-regulatory agency within the Commerce Department for which OIG has oversight responsibility, "be directed to produce a corrected analysis and report on the collapse of Building 7."

    Having received a letter in return stating that the matter was being referred back to NIST, and hearing nothing further, Pepper personally called the OIG on March 3, 2014. He left a voicemail in which he identified himself and explained why he was calling.

    Weiterlesen...
     
    University of Kent Debate: ‘Was 9/11 An Inside Job?’
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: AE911Truth Staff   
    Donnerstag, den 15. Mai 2014 um 00:00 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    On April 1st (not an April fool's joke!), a formal debate was held at the University of Kent in the UK to debate the topic 'Was 9/11 an inside job?'

    Kent Audience w Debate cap

    This was only the second formal debate about 9/11 conducted at a University in the UK. Arguing in support of the official story of 9/11 was University of Kent playwright and law student Edward Shambrook. Arguing that 9/11 had some element of inside support was Associate Professor Niels Harrit and Ian Henshall. Professor Harrit is a former Professor of Chemistry at Copenhagen University and has been one of the leading scientists working on the evidence for controlled demolition of the World Trade Center towers. He was a member of the team of scientists that discovered traces of thermite throughout the dust from the collapsed towers and had this published in a peer reviewed journal of chemistry. Ian Henshall is the UK's leading author on the evidence contradicting the official story of 9/11 and is the founder of the UK-based group 'Reinvestigate911.'

    Professor Harrit's visit to Kent from his home in Copenhagen, Denmark, was funded by AE911Truth, and we thank them sincerely for this invaluable support.

    Weiterlesen...
     
    AE911Truth Speaks in Los Angeles
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: AE911Truth Staff   
    Montag, den 05. Mai 2014 um 21:44 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    United We Stand Festival - May 10!

    Elegant Mothers Day Champagne Brunch / WTC Presentation - May 11

    This is your lucky month if you are ​anywhere ​near Los Angeles. Call your friends there if you are not! We will be speaking in a short panel format at the United We Stand Truth and Music Festival hosted by "Free & Equal ​ Elections​" at UCLA's Pauley Pavilion in Los Angeles on Saturday, May 10, 2014. The UWS Festival will showcase music as well as panels of musicians, actors, writers, journalists, and other speakers.

    UWS-Festival-Evite-update

    The next day, on Mother's Day we will be presenting the WTC evidence in our 90-min "9/11: Blueprint for Truth" live multimedia presentation to 2 groups of 40 at the home of Kathleen Rosenblatt - just 5 minutes away from the UCLA event. VIP's and Festival attendees alike will be attending the fabulous affair which includes an Elegant Mother's Day Champagne Brunch!

    Weiterlesen...
     
    Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—about 9/11? - Part 6: Conformity
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: Frances T. Shure   
    Mittwoch, den 30. April 2014 um 02:09 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    911-experts-shureSummary/Editor’s Note:

    Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: "Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?" The resulting essay, to be presented here as a series, is composed of a synthesis of reports on academic research as well as clinical observations.

    In answering the question in the title of this essay, last month’s segment, Part 5, explored the concepts of denial and cognitive dissonance. We resort to denial to avoid cognitive dissonance, that uncomfortable and sometimes disturbing feeling of losing our emotional equilibrium when faced with new information that challenges our worldview, or when we hold beliefs that are contradictory to known facts.

    In Part 6, we continue Ms. Shure’s analysis with the Solomon Asch experiments on conformity and Elizabeth Noelle-Neumann’s theory of the “spiral of silence.”

    Part 6: Conformity

    AschSoloman AschIn the early 1950s, experiments by Solomon Asch of Swarthmore College vividly demonstrated our human proclivity to conform to a group’s prevailing view. Several students selected prior to the experiment were instructed to act as if they were subjects of the experiment, whereas in reality, they were confederates, or plants. These confederates were all instructed to give the same wrong answer in identifying the length of a line on a card. One real and unsuspecting subject then joined the group, and when the experiment was under way, an instructor assigned the task of matching the length of a line on a card to the correct line among three different sized lines on the same card or another card. In 36.8% of the cases, the real subject would abandon his or her original right answer and would agree instead to the other participants’ unanimous wrong answer.1

    Weiterlesen...
     
    << Start < Zurück 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Weiter > Ende >>