left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    2,245 verifizierte professionelle Architekten und Ingenieure und 19,552 andere Befürworter inklusive A&I Studenten haben die Petition unterzeichnet, die vom Kongress eine neue, wirklich unabhängige Untersuchung fordert.

    Die Petition ist offen für Alle.


    Latest News

    Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: Frances T. Shure   
    Montag, den 20. Januar 2014 um 21:40 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    Part 3: Obeying and Believing Authority 

    © by Frances T. Shure, 2013

    911-experts-shureEditor’s Note: Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: “Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?” The resulting essay, to be presented here as a series, is a synthesis of reports on academic research as well as clinical observations.

    In answering the question in the title of this essay, last month’s segment, Part 2, addressed the anthropological study, Diffusion of Innovations, which discusses how change occurs in societies. These anthropologists discovered that, within diverse cultures, there can be found groups that vary in their openness to new ideas and technology—groups that fall within a neat bell curve. The success of the spread of an innovative technology or new idea reliably hinges on one point: whether or not opinion leaders vouch for it. In this context, the mainstream media can rightly be seen as promoting the official myth of 9/11, and therefore aiding and abetting the crimes of September 11, 2001.

    We continue Ms. Shure’s analysis in Part 3 with the authority experiments of Stanley Milgram, Jane Elliott, and Philip Zimbardo.

    In his famous 1961 experiment on obedience to authority, Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram set out to answer the question, “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?”

    Weiterlesen...
     
    Don't miss it! AE911Truth is gearing up…
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: AE911Truth Staff   
    Sonntag, den 05. Januar 2014 um 19:08 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    header splash-rethink

     
     

    AE911Truth is Your Organization

    Become a Member Today!

    Incredible supporters of AE911Truth,

    ReThink Times SquareReThink911 Times Square

    Of all the amazing projects that you have sponsored us to carry out in 2013, none was more inspiring to me than the 50-foot tall billboard towering over tens of thousands of people in New York's bustling Times Square below - where, on September 11th, we delivered a powerful set of speeches to the crowd of 250 AE911Truth supporters and others gathered beneath.

    I was also deeply struck by the massive letter-writing campaign to pressure local and global corporate media centers. Because of your sustained efforts, New York's metropolitan giant, the Village Voice featured the ReThink911 call for a new 9/11 investigation in its New Year's front page story about the "changes New Yorkers want to see in 2014" – yet another sign of the great effort AE911Truth supporters have been making and why you should join them today.

    This milestone raised the bar of achievement for AE911Truth's top agenda item in 2014:

    Outreach to the Public and News Media:

    Austin-NYT-Action-VOICE-must-AA-articleWith you as a member on our team, we will also have much greater success in breaking through the corporate media’s censorship – as local New York AE911Truth Action Group leader Austin Farwell did recently with NY’s Village VoiceYou know that the people must be given the facts about the intentional explosive destruction of the World Trade Center and that they must be inspired to act. You know that the corporate media must be pressured and embarrassed until the censorship of 9/11 Truth cracks wide open. And you know that only if you join with us and play your part in this historic endeavor will we be able to break through in 2014. It is not too late.

    Weiterlesen...
     
    Conclusion of Our Report on September Congressional Outreach
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: AE911Truth Staff   
    Sonntag, den 29. Dezember 2013 um 20:05 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

     

    AE911Truth Teams Sweep Through Capitol Hill

    banner-at-capital-bldgAs the sun sets in Washington DC – let us not lose faith in the latent power of the American people to awaken and force their elected representatives to deal with the actual crimes of 9/11.We reported back in October that we were Encouraging the Senate to ReThink 911 when we visited them during our September Action of the Month. We detailed Pamela Senzee’s visit with Ben Sundholm, Legislative Correspondent for Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ). In this article we highlight the other actions we took to educate members of Congress while we were in Washington.

    Wayne Coste, P.E., visited several Congressional offices the week before the DC911Truth Conference. We then invited conference attendees to join us in visiting their members of Congress. AE911Truth founder and CEO Richard Gage, AIA, hosted a group amounting to a dozen who traversed the honored halls the day after the conference.

    We attempted at least two dozen drop-in visits, with a constituent, for each of these members of Congress:

    Members of Congress table

    Weiterlesen...
     
    New Award-Winning Documentary Exposes Taboo, Challenges Intellectuals to Face Discomforting 9/11 Facts
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: Gregg Roberts   
    Samstag, den 28. Dezember 2013 um 22:42 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

     

    Film Review: 9/11 in the Academic Community

    911 academic comm film poster lg9/11 in the Academic Community is more watchable than most “9/11 truth” filmsThe exciting new documentary whose upcoming release we announced in a September 8 article is now here. 9/11 in the Academic Community was released for purchase on October 8, after having won an award for “Documentary Achievement” at the University of Toronto Film Festival earlier this year. At a manageable running time of 75 minutes, with a title designed to appeal to its target audience, and by avoiding hot-button phrases such as “9/11 Truth,” the film has an excellent chance of slipping out of the conspiracy theorist jacket and making inroads into the American and Canadian intellectual communities.

    This is certainly a film that needed to be made. With few exceptions, there has been a deafening silence in the classrooms of North American campuses regarding many obvious and undeniable facts that undermine the official account of 9/11. If the faculty and students at institutions of higher learning cannot question and even contradict what we have been told by media and government about the “crime of the century” without being called “conspiracy theorists,” then what has become of the academic community? Those who wrote the U.S. Constitution and defeated the British Empire’s dominion over the American colonies well understood that the spirit of free inquiry and an understanding of history were key to a properly functioning democratic republic. Even with those freedoms and values, Benjamin Franklin famously predicted that it would be difficult for us to “keep it.” Nothing less is at stake with regard to the issues covered in this film.

    9/11 in the Academic Community is more watchable than most “9/11 truth” films. One of its biggest strengths is that all of its speakers express criticisms of the way that the 9/11 account was advanced and how it’s been treated in the 12 years since then – mostly without sounding angry.

    Weiterlesen...
     
    Two More Calls to C-SPAN…Two More Members of Congress…
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: AE911Truth Staff   
    Samstag, den 28. Dezember 2013 um 18:42 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

     

    Representatives Express Willingness to Look at the Evidence

    For several months supporters of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth have been dialing into C-SPAN's morning call-in show, Washington Journal, to confront members of Congress, the media, and others with the scientific evidence proving that pre-planted explosives brought down the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11. Some callers have implored legislators to support a new investigation into the complete, rapid destruction of all three modern steel skyscrapers.

    degetteRep. Diana Degette, (D-CO)On October 20, 2013, Diana Degette, (D-CO), appeared as a guest on the morning show. Questioning Congress's credibility, a caller asked:

    "My question is concerning credibility of Congress in all of this. What credibility does Congress have left to govern with when basic physics have already proven that Building 7, World Trade Center 7, was brought down by explosives on 9/11, and the majority of Congressmen are willingly ignorant of this fact or can only offer rehearsed outrage in response to direct questions about this evidence?"

    Degette replied:

    Weiterlesen...
     
    Divided Federal Appeals Court Panel Rules: Negligence Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse; Dissenting Judge Asks, ‘What Did?’
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: Dennis P. McMahon, Esq, Gregg Roberts   
    Donnerstag, den 26. Dezember 2013 um 21:14 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    In a 2-1 split decision, [Aegis_v_Silverstein_COA_Opinion.pdf] a federal appeals court panel in the Second Circuit ruled that negligence didn’t cause the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, on September 11, 2001. In his dissenting opinion, Circuit Court Judge Richard Wesley stated, “One would think that, on this record, the majority, would want to hear from defendants’ experts on why 7WTC collapsed.”

    WTC7 Filmstrip World Trade Center 7 was completely destroyed in less than seven seconds. The plaintiff says “negligent design.” The Court would not look at the evidence for such – or at the evidence for the true cause of the destructionThe lawsuit involved an action brought by Con Ed, a New York City power utility company that, along with its insurers, sued the defendants – 7 World Trade Co., L.P., Silverstein Development Corp., and Silverstein Properties, Inc. – who designed, built, operated, and maintained Building 7. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants’ negligence had caused Building 7 to collapse, thereby destroying the electrical substation owned by Con Ed directly underneath the building.

    Weiterlesen...
     
    September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Geschrieben von: AE911Truth Staff   
    Donnerstag, den 19. Dezember 2013 um 14:04 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    A DVD by Massimo Mazzucco

    Review of the Film by Simon Day and Commentary on the Italian Premiere by AE911Truth Staff

    The DVD reviewed here is quite important for the 9/11 Truth movement generally. However, it ventures far outside the scope of AE911Truth’s mission and area of expertise. While we review, and wholeheartedly embrace, the excellent segments of the DVD that cover the World Trade Center evidence, we specifically do not endorse, or even discuss, the other three hours of material on the DVD.

    The New Pearl HarborAward-winning director Massimo Mazzucco commands the debate with the “debunkers” in this powerful new documentary about the 9/11 Truth Movement’s challenge to the official conspiracy theories of 9/11.In September 1997, “The Project for the New American Century,” a Washington, DC-based US think tank, was founded with the purpose of promoting US global leadership. In September 2000, they published a report entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century.” In this document, we find the following statement: “[T]he process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor.”

    Wind the clock on another year to the devastating events of September 11th, 2001, and we have a plausible candidate for this New Pearl Harbor. This is the case made by Massimo Mazzucco in his superb new DVD, September 11 – The New Pearl Harbor. This epic production stands head and shoulders above most of the other offerings that try to span the spectrum of the events on 9/11. So what makes this one so special? For me, there are three key points to be highlighted.

    The first is the quality of the presentation. Many documentaries address this complex subject, but fail to achieve a level of professionalism. In contrast, Mazzucco’s production has the sort of quality that one might see on television or in the mainstream media.

    The second is the enormous depth and quality of the research that has gone into the production. Mazzucco has let out all the stops, has explored most of the angles, and provides a wealth of information. A lot of the information in the film was obtained through the efforts of various researchers in the 9/11 Truth Movement via Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Key facets of the controversial issues surrounding 9/11 are presented meticulously and fairly.

    The third is Mazzucco’s adherence to the principles of logic and science.

    Weiterlesen...
     
    << Start < Zurück 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Weiter > Ende >>