left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth
    Down Under 9/11 Blogger Dreams Up Episode for Dr. "Bones" Brennan
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Neuigkeiten - News Releases By Others
    Geschrieben von: Dahlia Mae Lachlan   
    Dienstag, den 14. Oktober 2014 um 22:08 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    Editor's Note: Our September newsletter introduced readers to Australian 9/11 blogger Dahlia Mae Lachlan, who, in this AE911Truth article republished from her blog site GumshoeNews.com, called on Sir Isaac Newton's scientific discoveries to make the case that the three toppled towers were subjected not to gravitational collapses but to controlled demolitions.

    In one of her more recent blogs, Lachlan wishes she could tap the skills of a modern-day scientist — forensic anthropologist Dr. Temperance Brennan of the TV crime show "Bones" — to prove that the bone fragments found on World Trade Center neighbor Deutsche Bank in the days and years after 9/11 indicate pre-planted explosives. To see how this evidence is "the smoking gun — the bullet that blasts holes right through the official story" — read on.

    BONES — The Forensic Evidence of Explosives

    You know Bones — the American television crime series? It is a pity they didn't do an episode where Dr. "Bones" Brennan investigates "Cold Case — Deutsche Bank 9/11." Anyway, it would be too easily solved. Because the abundance of bone fragments from the World Trade Center's Twin Towers on 9/11 is the smoking gun — the bullet that blasts holes right through the official story.

    You see, just like the impossibility of Building 7 being brought down by fires — a fire has never caused the total destruction of a steel skyscraper (as discussed on ae911truth.org) — so is it equally impossible that fires and collapsing buildings have ever pulverized people like those who were killed in the Twin Towers. EVER. Those who try to confuse the 9/11 Truth Movement with bunkum about structural abnormalities, no planes, whistle-blowers on meds, or who twist words and theories to suit the official theory — go ahead. It doesn't count here. Supported by evidence of Nano-thermite, people were turned to dust — pieces 1/16-inch small, thousands of pieces — including firefighters (most likely inside stairwells). The forensic logic of the "9/11 bone fragments" is the DNA bullet in the official story, making a mockery of NIST's document. These bone fragments from the firefighters burn any official theory to ash — and make the entire concealment of all the other evidence a fraud.

    Read more...

     
    NIST's WTC 7 Reports: Filled with Fantasy, Fiction, and Fraud
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Neuigkeiten - Neue Veröffentlichungen von AE911Truth
    Geschrieben von: Simon Falkner and Chris Sarns   
    Samstag, den 08. November 2014 um 16:39 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    Why 2,300 Architects & Engineers Demand Independent Investigation

    INTRODUCTION

    Editor's Note: This fascinating and provocative technical article on NIST’s mistreatment of the WTC 7 evidence is broken down into a series of six articles. The first installment, below, is the INTRODUCTION to the whole series. Stand by for the next five installments in subsequent articles, to be published monthly.

    Introduction

    The United States government's official investigator of the destruction of the three skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, is the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), an arm of the Department of Commerce. The agency became highly politicized during a Clinton-era restructuring. "In essence," recalls a NIST whistleblower, "we lost our scientific independence, and became little more than 'hired guns.'"

    NIST has made many false written and oral statements about the collapses of the three World Trade Center buildings on 9/11 — statements that have now caused 2,300 architects and engineers to question the government investigator's credibility and veracity. One of its most implausible claims is that a high-rise steel structure in New York City was destroyed by fire alone.

    wtc7 demolition comparison Figure 1. NIST's final report states that random office fires alone brought down Building 7. However, the collapse of WTC 7 compared, side by side, with an acknowledged professional controlled demolition reveals an entirely different story. Only a handful of companies have the ability to neatly implode a steel-framed skyscraper into its own footprint like this. Click on this video to see WTC 7 fall next to three acknowledged professional CDs.

    Indeed, the fall of World Trade Center Building 7 is the third of the three only known "global collapses" of high-rise, steel-framed buildings ever recorded, and all three incredibly took place in one day: September 11, 2001.

    NIST contends that the Twin Towers were brought down by the impact damage and consequent fires from the large airliner jets that hit them. But no jet struck WTC 7, and NIST claims that office fires alone demolished that building. The agency does admit that, if true, this would be the first and only time that an office fire brought down a steel skyscraper.

    Ultimately, we are asked to accept on faith NIST's ever-changing, remarkable, and, frankly, suspect explanations for WTC 7's destruction.

    Weiterlesen...
     
    25 Points of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Neuigkeiten - Neue Veröffentlichungen von AE911Truth
    Geschrieben von: AE911Truth Staff   
    Samstag, den 01. November 2014 um 12:57 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    A White Paper on NIST's Omissions, Distortions, and Fraud

    Editor's Note: In recent years, various members of the AE911Truth team have been working on a white paper titled “Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports.” Last month they finally completed the document. Its 25 concise points offer the most convincing proof that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the September 11, 2001, destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings were unscientific and fraudulent. The authors of "The 25 Points" designed the document to provide material that would compel the convening of a grand jury. Whether or not a grand jury is ever impaneled in any jurisdiction, though, readers of this white paper have the duty and privilege of acting as a virtual grand jury in all jurisdictions. After weighing the evidence meticulously laid out in "The 25 Points," readers can, by their resulting actions, help determine whether there will one day be a new, fully funded, truly independent, wholly transparent, and unimpeachably honest investigation of 9/11.


    Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports

    Below is a series of twenty-five provable points which clearly demonstrate that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) were unscientific and fraudulent. Therefore NIST itself – including its lead authors, Shyam Sunder and John Gross - should be investigated.

    Weiterlesen...
     
    ReThink911 Events in New York on September 11, 2013
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Neuigkeiten - News Releases By Others
    Geschrieben von: ReThink911 Campaign   
    Mittwoch, den 11. September 2013 um 13:40 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

     

    An All-Day Tour Culminating with Times Square Rally: “9/11: Ignoring the Evidence is No Longer an Option”

    Update: Tune into our live video stream at http://www.ustream.tv/occupythefed starting at 5:20 Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 11 – the time of day that WTC 7 came down on 9/11/2001. Be on time!

    times-square-billboardNYC activists at Times Square for the unveiling of the ReThink911 billboard

    Weiterlesen...
     
    ReThink911 Poll: One in Two Americans Have Doubts About Government’s Account of 9/11
    Drucken
    E-Mail
    Neuigkeiten - News Releases By Others
    Geschrieben von: AE911Truth Staff   
    Dienstag, den 10. September 2013 um 07:50 Uhr
    Es gibt leider keine Übersetzung.

    46% Suspect Controlled Demolition of Building 7 after Seeing Footage

    On the 12th anniversary of 9/11, a new national survey by the polling firm YouGov reveals that one in two Americans have doubts about the government’s account of 9/11. In addition, after viewing video footage of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse, 46% suspect that it was caused by a controlled demolition.

    Read the full article and download the poll results at http://rethink911.org/news/new-poll-finds-most-americans-open-to-alternative-911-theories.

     
    << Start < Zurück 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Weiter > Ende >>

    Seite 1 von 127