DEBUNKING THE REAL 9/11 MYTHS:

WHY POPULAR MECHANICS CAN’T FACE UP TO REALITY

By Adam Taylor

Editor’s note: This is Part 10 of 10 (see Part 9), the conclusion of an extensive report by 9/11 researcher Adam Taylor that exposes the fallacies and flaws in the arguments made by the writers and editors of Popular Mechanics (PM) in the latest edition of Debunking 9/11 Myths. We encourage you to submit your own reviews of the book at Amazon.com and other places where it is sold. (Quotes from PM are shown in red and with page numbers.)

Part 10:

Minimal Wreckage to Study

More than 100,000 tons of WTC building debris was removed from Ground Zero in the three weeks following 9/11, making a proper on-site investigation impossible In the last section of their book covering WTC7, PM’s writers and editors discuss the fact that the steel from Ground Zero was quickly removed from the site and recycled. 9/11 researchers have cited this as evidence of a cover-up. However, PM’s writers attempt to explain why there was nothing unusual about this speedy cleanup of Ground Zero, and we see that, once again, their excuses are groundless.

PM starts off by quoting Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) structural engineer Gene Corley:

“There has been some concern expressed by others that the work of the team has been hampered because debris was removed from the site and has subsequently been processed for recycling,” Gene Corley told the U.S. House Representatives’ Committee on Science in March 2002. “This is not the case. The team has had full access to the scrap yards and to the site and has been able to obtain numerous samples. At this point there is no indication that having access to each piece of steel from the World Trade Center would make a significant difference to understanding the performance of the structures.” (p. 86)

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/764-announcing-rethink911.html http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/764-announcing-rethink911.html

Announcing:

ReThink911

The Ad that Will Be Seen Around the World

The “metro” version of the ad is one of several that are being developed for various types of outdoor media. The highway billboard version will be much simpler. Read the fascinating story below about the design and polling of the ReThink911 ad.

]]> AE_Forms@ae911truth.org (AE911Truth) frontpage Thu, 30 May 2013 01:16:02 +0000 http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/763-wtc-7-comes-to-3-million-more-pbs-tv-viewers.html http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/763-wtc-7-comes-to-3-million-more-pbs-tv-viewers.html

5-Minute ‘Spotlight On’ Segment Re-Airing this Summer!

Editor’s Note: If you see the 5-minute version of Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 on your local PBS station, please let us know. Just use the Contact Us form on our website; make sure to select “Other” In the “Subject Area” field and enter “Spotlight On” in the “Subject” field. Thanks!

AE911Truth is proud to air once again the fascinating 5-minute excerpt of Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 on PBS stations nationwide!Award-winning actor Ed Asner provides an intriguing narration to Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 that eases viewers into the astonishing evidence surrounding the skyscraper’s destruction on 9/11 This mini-documentary, narrated by Ed Asner, introduces viewers to the “collapse” of WTC Building 7 on 9/11 and includes the expert testimony of technical and building professionals. The shortened version of our Youtube hit fills in between 55-minute PBS programs such as Frontline, Masterpiece Theater, and News Hour.

The 15-minute version of the film was created for those who choose to visit the AE911Truth website. It is also the best version to share with others because it concisely demonstrates the utter falsity of the official explanation for the skyscraper’s destruction.

]]> AE_Forms@ae911truth.org (Chris Sarns) frontpage Wed, 22 May 2013 02:33:01 +0000 http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/761-fraud-exposed-in-nist-wtc-7-reports-part-1.html http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/761-fraud-exposed-in-nist-wtc-7-reports-part-1.html

Chris Sarns

Editor’s note: To this day most people, including many architects and engineers, are not aware that a third skyscraper, World Trade Center Building 7, mysteriously collapsed along with the World Trade Center Twin Towers on September 11, 2001. The official report on this building’s collapse by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been challenged by many reputable and credentialed technical professionals. The NIST analysis has not undergone the rigors of scientific peer review – the typical pathway for validating significant scientific theories. Chris Sarns’ research appears in Dr. David Ray Griffin’s book titled "The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7." The studies below represent years of work by Chris in unraveling some of the most glaring inconsistencies and outright frauds in the NIST report on World Trade Center 7. He demonstrates that the NIST’s theory of the fire-induced collapse of Building 7 is faulty and misleading.

The destruction of this skyscraper on September 11 was truly unprecedented in the history of high-rise buildings. More than 1,900 architects and engineers at AE911Truth are demanding a new investigation.

]]> AE_Forms@ae911truth.org (Chris Sarns) frontpage Wed, 08 May 2013 23:51:29 +0000 http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/760-senator-john-mccain-free-falls-on-911-again.html http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/760-senator-john-mccain-free-falls-on-911-again.html

WTC Building 7 Highlighted on C-SPAN TV

Editor’s note: 911 Free Fall Radio show host Andrew Steele spoke truth to power when he asked Senator John McCain about the freefall of WTC7 on C-SPAN last month. AE911Truth Action Groups Leader Pam Senzee recently approached McCain and spoke with him about the evidence of nanothermite in the WTC dust. We encourage all of our supporters to follow their lead and reach out to local and federal representatives with this important information. If you also have video of peaceful but provocative encounters such as these, post them online and let us know!

On April 9, 2013, Senator John McCain appeared on C-SPAN’s live call-in show Washington Journal. I asked him the following question:

Click the image above to Watch the Video

“The National Institute of Standards and Technology asserts that the collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11 was caused by fire. Yet they acknowledge that the first 100 feet of that collapse took place at free-fall acceleration. Engineers will tell you that fire cannot do this, that the only method by which it can be accomplished is the use of pre-planted explosives.

How do you explain this discrepancy...of a hundred feet of free fall, without the use of explosives?”

As the video shows, John McCain claimed ignorance, saying, “To tell you the truth, this is an area that I’m not very familiar...and if you would drop me a note and mention that we talked on C-SPAN, I’d be glad to get you a more complete answer.

]]> AE_Forms@ae911truth.org (By Andrew Steele, 911FreeFall.com) frontpage Sun, 05 May 2013 23:53:58 +0000 http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/758-faq-12-where-are-the-911-whistleblowers.html http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/758-faq-12-where-are-the-911-whistleblowers.html

with contributing editor Eli Rika

Many of those who cannot accept the scientific evidence that refutes the official story of the collapse of the three WTC towers on 9/11/2001 argue, “If 9/11 was an inside operation, surely at least one whistleblower would have come forward by now. You couldn’t keep something like that secret.” While at first blush this argument might seem to be logical, closer examination shows that it makes no sense.Independent 9/11 researcher Gregg Roberts has responded to many false assertions from the defenders of the official 9/11 story Since scientific evidence has clearly shown that the official explanation for the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers cannot be true, the theory that the official story must be true because there have been “no 9/11 whistleblowers” is entirely specious.

In his groundbreaking 2006 research paper entitled “Where Are The 9/11 Whistleblowers?”,
9/11 researcher Gregg Roberts addresses the subject in painstaking detail. At one key point, Roberts notes that “physics trumps armchair psychology.” That is, the evidence is what determines whether 9/11 involved more than what officials are telling us, not an assumed theory about the power of the whistleblower.However, for the sake of those who adhere to the baseless 9/11 whistleblower theory, let’s examine the alleged power of the 9/11 whistleblower by first defining “whistleblower,”…

]]> AE_Forms@ae911truth.org (Dennis McMahon, J.D. L.L.M.,) frontpage Wed, 01 May 2013 00:03:21 +0000 http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/756-upcoming-events-bring-ae911truth-message-to-new-audiences.html http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/756-upcoming-events-bring-ae911truth-message-to-new-audiences.html

Will Your City be Next?

Are you eager to have Richard Gage, AIA, and other AE911Truth experts speak in your city? Send us a message, and your goal can become a reality. AE911Truth has very dedicated activists in every major U.S. city, and our nation is dotted with many towns, large and small, that are filled with our supporters. Often they will call us and simply say, “You just have to come to our city. The people here have to be exposed to reality.”

You can bring us to your city as well. We simply need airfare and baggage fees reimbursed, as well as a reasonable honorarium and a place to stay – and a diligent effort on your part to fill a venue with 100 to 200 people. With good planning and execution, you can also make money for your local AE911Truth Action Group. If you are interested in hosting us, just fill out the Contact Us form on our website, and make sure to select…

]]> AE_Forms@ae911truth.org (AE911Truth Staff) frontpage Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:59:02 +0000