Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner

    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09

    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version

    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"

    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Read it at AE911Truth.org

    Latest News

    Draw Your Line in the Sand with a Letter to CNN
    Written by Craig McKee   
    Thursday, 26 June 2014 13:14

    AE911Truth Slandered over 9/11 Museum Outreach — Legal Action Considered

    Counter the attack on AE and its 9/11 Museum brochures

    Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth needs your energy and your outrage over how the organization and the cause of 9/11 Truth were treated by the mainstream media last month.

    Specifically, we're asking you to write a letter to CNN to let the station know how you feel about the recent installment of The Lead with Jake Tapper. The five-minute report dealt with the AE911Truth initiative to distribute our alternative brochures at the site of the newly opened National September 11 Memorial and Museum, which we attended. You can send your letter to CNN via this link on its web site.

    For background on the AE911Truth reaction to the CNN report, read the article currently posted on our website.

    The-Lead-With-Jake-Tapper-FrownThe Lead with Jake TapperTapper and Bazelon claimed that handing out museum brochures that mimicked the design of the "official" ones but contained an alternative perspective on 9/11 was an affront to the victims' families and that we were "spreading lies." They alleged that those who challenge the official story are motivated by anti-Semitism and a need to "make sense of the senseless." And, to no one's surprise, they ignored all the scientific evidence that AE and other experienced researchers have presented over the nearly 13 years since the event.

    Written by AE911Truth Staff   
    Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:01


    Controversy Brims at Grand Opening of 9/11 Museum AE911Truth On-Site to Set The Record Straight

    There was an awakening in New York last week as 9/11 Truth activists converged at the World Trade Centers for the Grand Opening of the September 11 Memorial Museum.

    Press-ConfAE911Truth held a "What you won’t find in this 9/11 museum" press conference at the entrance to the Memorial Grounds, speaking to a gathered audience of about two dozen people.

    FAQ #14: Are Tall Buildings Safer as a Result of the NIST WTC Reports?
    Written by Kevin Ryan   
    Wednesday, 18 June 2014 22:55

    International-Bldg-codes-handbookInternational Building Codes HandbookEditor's Note:

    The short and simple answer: NO! A longer, more complex response: In 2002, Witold Rybczynski, emeritus professor of architecture at the University of Pennsylvania, wrote that the initial investigation into 9/11 by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) "...did not reveal any design deficiencies [in the WTC towers] or any 'specific structural features that would be regarded as substandard,' nor did it make any definite recommendations to safeguard tall buildings."

    "Such recommendations will come," he added confidently, noting that NIST would be spending two years and $16 million to investigate the cause of the Twin Towers collapse, and that their findings would surely lead to new regulations resulting in safer structures.

    Watch these raging infernos in steel-framed structures around the globe
    Written by Carolyn Clark   
    Wednesday, 18 June 2014 21:12

    Then ask yourself: "Did the laws of physics not apply on 9/11?"

    Scootle-Royale-Video“The truth is, before 9/11, the term global collapse didn’t even exist. Buildings survived fires, plane crashes, earthquakes, terrorist attacks, botched demolitions and even nuclear explosions. Never, before or after 9/11, have we seen such catastrophic failures.”

    This three-and-a-half-minute video — "9/11 In Perspective" — presents footage of eight buildings, ranging from nine to 62 floors, that have been either partially or fully engulfed in flames and yet remained standing despite massive internal destruction. Their major fires shown in these clips range from 1988 to 2008, and took place in U.S. cities (Philadelphia, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles) and abroad (Caracas, Madrid, Beijing, Delft).

    AE911Truth Reaches Out to Philosophers and Engineers
    Written by AE911Truth Staff   
    Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:27

    Peer review sought for official WTC 7 report


    Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia, was host to the 2014 Forum on Philosophy, Engineering and Technology (fPET) for three days at the end of May. The mission of this international forum is to foster scholarship and reflection by teachers and practitioners of ethics, engineering, philosophy, technology, the social sciences, and education.

    Nearly 50 papers and lectures were presented by authors from North America, Europe, and China. The wide-ranging topics covered engineering education, the social responsibilities of engineers, pedagogical techniques for ethics, and case studies on engineering ethics. Among the latter was a case study titled "Neglecting Peer Review: A Case Study of Engineering Ethics and the Official Reports about the Destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) on 9/11," written by AE911Truth Presenter Team members Wayne Coste and Mikie Smith, and presented by Coste at the forum.

    Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—about 9/11? - Part 7: Groupthink
    Written by Frances T. Shure   
    Saturday, 31 May 2014 18:52

    911-experts-shureSummary/Editor's Note:

    Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: "Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?" The resulting essay, to be presented here as a series, is a synthesis of both academic research and clinical observations.

    In addressing the question in the title of this essay, last month's segment,

    Part 6, explored the phenomenon of conformity, featuring the Solomon Asch experiments and Elizabeth Noelle-Neumann's study of German elections with her resulting theory of the "spiral of silence." We discussed the human proclivity to adhere to social norms in order to keep one's reputation intact, and we noted that this strong inclination can often trump evidence, openness, curiosity, and the human need for truth.

    In Part 7, we continue Ms. Shure's analysis with an especially maladaptive form of conformity called "groupthink."

    Part 7: Groupthink

    janis-webPsychologist Irving L. JanisConforming to folkways and mores is natural, and it can help a society function cohesively and smoothly. There is, however, a threshold at which conforming becomes maladaptive and produces poor decisions. Crossing this threshold leads us into the phenomenon of "groupthink," first studied by social psychologist Irving L. Janis.

    9/11 Outreach Using the AE911Truth Petition
    Written by David Fura   
    Saturday, 31 May 2014 18:13

    Here's an exciting way that you can make a difference!

    The 9/11 Truth Movement faces daunting obstacles in getting our message out to Jane and John Q. Public. We have a U.S. government seemingly working against us with its flawed investigations and denied requests for information. For whatever reason, the mainstream news media refuse to broadcast key evidence that refutes the official story while pouring ridicule and condemnation on anyone else who tries. Paid advertising that can reach thousands if not millions at a time remains an expensive luxury. What can we do to get around these obstacles? What should we be doing right now to give us our best shot at winning? In short, what are our advantages? Do we even have any?


    Fura-quote-1For all the power that the government and the media have over us, one thing they can't do is prevent us from talking to people. More specifically, they can't stop thousands of us  from talking one-on-one with thousands of new people each and every day. This, combined with the power of our evidence, is arguably our biggest advantage of all.

    << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>