left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth
    New 9/11 truth documentary among 'most watched' on PBS this week
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By Others
    Wednesday, 05 September 2012 09:33

    "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" is getting public attention and casting doubt on the scientific validity of the U.S. government's investigation into the WTC tragedy. PBS is the first major network to air the program.

    Just days away from the 11th anniversary of the World Trade Center tragedy and months away from the U.S. presidential election, a game-changing 9/11 documentary is ranking number three among "most watched" documentaries on PBS and number one among "most shared." Available for free online August 18th - September 4th, the documentary could have a significant effect on public opinion. [Update: PBS has extended viewing indefinitely.] Both the Republicans and Democrats, as equally staunch defenders of the official story, stand to be affected if the public's suspicion of government corruption grows deeper.

    Read more...
     
    News - Action Alerts
    Tuesday, 29 January 2013 20:27

    Now on iTunes, Hulu, Amazon, Flixter and Rotten Tomatoes:

    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

    Let Millions of People Know
    Just a Few Clicks!

     

    Update: Great news! 9/11 Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out is also listed on IMDb.com, the #1 movie site in the world! Click here to visit our page on IMDb and write a review about this compelling documentary.

    Our powerful documentary, 9/11 Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, is poised to take the Internet by storm! It’s now available for sale and streaming on iTunes, Hulu, and Amazon.com.

    9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on iTunes 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on Hulu 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on Amazon.com 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on Rotten Tomatoes 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on iTunes

    And now we’re asking you to help by reviewing this myth-shattering film on these popular sites, as well as Rotten Tomatoes and Flixster, exposing it to web users around the world!

    Here are your quick and easy outreach steps:

    Read more...
     
    Twin Cities Dot Com - Pioneer Press writes: "Those unconvinced by 'official' 9/11 story meet at St. Paul U campus
    Print
    E-mail
    News - Press Coverage
    Friday, 06 May 2011 12:25

    Editor's note: The only bad press is no press - as they say. Well here's some press - you decide. It's from our stop in St Paul where AE911Truth delivered lots of evidence for the destruction of the three World Trade Center Skyscrapers. But this writer quotes none of it, and spends an awful lot of attention on Canada's National Post editor, Jonathan Kay, as well as making it look like a conspiracy fest.

    Those unconvinced by 'official' 9/11 story meet at St. Paul U campus

    So-called 'truthers' seek to uncover government conspiracy

    by Richard Chin of TwinCities.com Pioneer Press

    When Richard Gage came to Minnesota recently to talk about Sept. 11, he started with three questions.

    How many people believed "the official story" of the World Trade Center attack, asked Gage, the founder of an organization called Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

    Read more...
     
    Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Written by Frances T. Shure   
    Tuesday, 30 September 2014 19:51

    Part 10: Terror Management Theory

    and

    Part 11: Systems Justification Theory

    © by Frances T. Shure, 2014

    911-experts-shure Editor’s Note: Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: “Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?” The resulting essay, being presented here as a series, is a synthesis of both academic research and clinical observations.

    In answering the question in the title of this essay, the August segment, Part 9, reported on the interface between brain research and the study of moral psychology, and how this research demonstrates that some moral convictions are innate and thus hardwired in the human nervous system. Additionally, we learned that some of these innate brain structures make it difficult for 9/11 Truth activists to present their evidence, as well as for listeners to receive this evidence openly.

    We continue Ms. Shure’s analysis in October with a dual offering — Part 10: Terror Management Theory, and Part 11: Systems Justification Theory. They examine, respectively, how the fear of our own death and the need to feel good about the cultural system in which we live create resistance to the evidence presented by 9/11 skeptics.

    Part 10: Terror Management Theory

    terror-mngt-theory-articleTerror Management Theory postulates that whenever we are introduced to information that reminds us of death — such as simply the mention of 9/11 — our anxiety increases, since we are reminded of our own inevitable death. This anxiety is called “mortality salience.” Studies show that our behavior immediately becomes more defensive when we are reminded of death. In turn, we become increasingly insecure. This normally causes us to show increased preference for members of our own group (the "in group") over out-group members; to show more “consensus bias,” or favoritism toward those who hold beliefs similar to our own; and to develop “compensatory conviction,” an inflated faith in our personal worldview, such as a bias toward our own country and religion.

    Therefore, when we skeptics try to educate people about 9/11, we provoke anxiety in our listeners since, unconsciously, we are reminding them of their own death. More defensive behaviors then ensue.

    In addition, if our listeners view us as members of a minority group, they usually resist what we are saying — at least initially. If, on the other hand, they view us as members of the majority group, they are more likely to accept our information. In other words, people like to be on the winning side, or in the middle of the bell curve, as we saw in Part 6: Conformity.

    As of this writing, skeptics of the official account of 9/11 are generally viewed as holding a minority opinion, but this need not remain the case. The good news is that research shows that information coming from a perceived minority group, although initially resisted, often exerts a hidden or delayed impact. When listeners hear dissenting views repeated, those views become more familiar. Thus, resistant individuals, when interviewed later, often show shifts in favor of the new information.1

    German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer intuitively understood this delayed impact when he wrote,

    Read more...
     
    Can Americans Escape the Deception?
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By Others
    Thursday, 05 July 2012 13:03

    Editor's Note: The following article was written by former Assistant Treasury Secretary and Wall Street Journal editor Paul Craig Roberts for OpEdNews after he attended the Atlanta premiere of 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out. We applaud him for his unwavering dedication to the truth and his courage to speak out about 9/11.

    Former Assistant Treasury Secretary Paul Craig Roberts did not hesitate to call for a new 9/11 investigation after watching Experts Speak Out

    Hot Air Day is upon us. On July 4, hot air will spew forth all over the country as dignitaries deliver homilies to our "freedom and democracy" and praise "our brave troops" who are protecting our freedom by "killing them over there before they come over here."

    Not a single one of these speeches will contain one word of truth. No speaker will lament the death of the US Constitution or urge his audience to action to restore the only document that protects their liberty. No speaker will acknowledge that in the 21st century the Bush/Obama Regime, with the complicity of the Department of Justice, federal courts, Congress, presstitute media, law schools, bar associations, and an insouciant public have murdered the Constitution in the name of the "war on terror.

    Read more...
     
    << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

    Page 4 of 127