left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth
    Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Written by Frances T. Shure, M.A., L.P.C.   
    Thursday, 23 October 2014 19:11

    Part 12: Signal Detection Theory

    © by Frances T. Shure, 2014

    911-experts-shure Editor’s Note: Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: “Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?” The resulting essay, being presented here as a series, is a synthesis of both academic research and clinical observations.

    In answering the question in the title of this essay, the two October segments — Part 10: Terror Management Theory, and Part 11: Systems Justification Theory — examined, respectively, how the fear of our own death, and the need to feel good about the cultural system in which we live, can create resistance to the evidence indicating that the official story about 9/11 is a lie. Research shows that even though the educational efforts of 9/11 skeptics may be resisted, there is a delayed impact upon the listener, resulting in later attitude shifts in favor of the facts about 9/11.

    We continue Ms. Shure's analysis in November with Part 12: Signal Detection Theory, which reports on whether or not people perceive information amid external and internal distractions, and how this perception may effect their receptivity to the educational efforts of 9/11 skeptics.

    The study of how acutely individuals discriminate when making decisions, including psychological factors that bias those decisions, has resulted in the Signal Detection Theory.1

    Nearly all human decisions are made in an environment of uncertainty. All of the stimuli, both external and internal, that create this uncertainty are called “noise.” To perceive reality accurately, we must be able to detect a “signal” amid the distracting noise. The more noise there is, the harder it is to detect the signal.

    Example: You are looking for a person (signal) in a crowded room. If there are 100 people (external noise) in the room, your likelihood of spotting her is much greater than if there are 1,000 people (more external noise) in the room. If you are exhausted (internal noise) or you view the person as disagreeable (internal noise), you will have a harder time finding her.

    How does this theory apply to why people are silent, or worse, about the information provided to them by 9/11 skeptics?

    Let's assume you're a believer in the official 9/11 story. You meet a friend at a crowded party. The music is loud. Over the din, he tells you he thinks 9/11 was a false flag operation. He pulls his smart phone from his pocket and shows you World Trade Center Building 7 falling into its own footprint. He tells you that 2.25 seconds of this collapse (eight floors’ worth) was at free-fall acceleration, and that this can only be explained if explosives cut through the steel columns. You like and respect this friend, so you are open to his signal. But can you hear it clearly enough to make a decision about reality?

    Read more...
     
    Seminar on science of Trade Center disasters raises questions
    Print
    E-mail
    News - Press Coverage
    Tuesday, 06 December 2011 17:44

    By Perla Trevizo, Chattanooga Times Free Press, 11/16/11

    Editor’s Note: The "The Science of 9/11 Truth” symposium at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga drew over 300 attendees and the support of many University faculty. Journalist Perla Trevizo provided an unbiased and accurate report of the event for the Times Free Press. We applaud Trevizo and the Times Free Press for covering this important news story in a fair and balanced manner, and we encourage other mainstream news outlets to follow their lead.

    An audience of over 300 looks on as University faculty and technical experts discuss the science behind the destruction of the three WTC high-rises

    Questions should be asked about the science behind the falling of the World Trade Center buildings 10 years ago, panelists agreed Tuesday night.

    The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga hosted the event, "The Science of 9/11," which began with a moment of silence for the families who lost loved ones.

    The discussion "is an opportunity to illustrate the application of the scientific method to a real life event that most Americans remember exactly where they were," said UTC professor of anthropology Lyn Miles, one of the event's coordinators.

    Read more...
     
    Small But Significant Triumph for 9/11 Truth Activist in UK Court
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By Others
    Thursday, 28 February 2013 15:15

    By Victoria N. Alexander, Digital Journal

    Editor’s Note: For more information about Tony Rooke’s court case and to find out how you can get involved in future efforts, send Tony an email. You can also listen to Tony’s radio interview on 9/11 Free Fall.

    In an act of civil disobedience, Tony Rooke refused to pay a £130 TV license fee, alleging that the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks. Facing a judge Monday, Rooke was not convicted and did not have to pay the fine.



    Rooke, a documentary maker who made his protest against the BBC in Horsham Magistrates’ Court in West Sussex, claims the BBC reported that World Trade Center 7 collapsed “due to an office fire, which, even the NIST Report says, fell at free-fall speed for eight floors in 2.5 seconds. That is absolutely impossible without a controlled demolition being involved.”

    Read more...
     
    News - Action Alerts
    Tuesday, 29 January 2013 20:27

    Now on iTunes, Hulu, Amazon, Flixter and Rotten Tomatoes:

    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

    Let Millions of People Know
    Just a Few Clicks!

     

    Update: Great news! 9/11 Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out is also listed on IMDb.com, the #1 movie site in the world! Click here to visit our page on IMDb and write a review about this compelling documentary.

    Our powerful documentary, 9/11 Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, is poised to take the Internet by storm! It’s now available for sale and streaming on iTunes, Hulu, and Amazon.com.

    9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on iTunes 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on Hulu 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on Amazon.com 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on Rotten Tomatoes 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on iTunes

    And now we’re asking you to help by reviewing this myth-shattering film on these popular sites, as well as Rotten Tomatoes and Flixster, exposing it to web users around the world!

    Here are your quick and easy outreach steps:

    Read more...
     
    Cyrus Vance, Jr., Manhattan D.A., On Notice, Again
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Written by AE911Truth Staff   
    Monday, 03 November 2014 00:00

    AE911Truth's Report to the Public

    Vance-MuppetCyrus Vance, Jr., Manhattan D.A.For eight years, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has sought an impartial, subpoena-powered investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11, 2001.

    On February 14, 2013, AE911Truth petitioned the office of Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., district attorney in and for New York County, asking Vance for a confidential meeting with him and/or with any members of his staff he chose to designate. Our purpose in requesting this meeting was to discuss the appointment of a special prosecutor, and the calling of a grand jury, to investigate the explosive 12-second destruction of each of the Twin Towers, and the unprecedented free-fall "collapse" of Building 7 on 9/11.

    We made a formal offer of proof based on the evidence — forensic evidence that overwhelmingly and irrefutably shows, by itemization of the key facts and by supplemental video of important witnesses, that the three skyscrapers at the World Trade Center were destroyed on 9/11 as a result of professionally engineered controlled demolition, not by office fires and/or aircraft collision.

    Read more...
     
    << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

    Page 4 of 128