left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth
    Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Written by Frances T. Shure   
    Tuesday, 30 September 2014 19:51

    Part 10: Terror Management Theory

    and

    Part 11: Systems Justification Theory

    © by Frances T. Shure, 2014

    911-experts-shure Editor’s Note: Frances Shure, M.A., L.P.C., has performed an in-depth analysis addressing a key issue of our time: “Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?” The resulting essay, being presented here as a series, is a synthesis of both academic research and clinical observations.

    In answering the question in the title of this essay, the August segment, Part 9, reported on the interface between brain research and the study of moral psychology, and how this research demonstrates that some moral convictions are innate and thus hardwired in the human nervous system. Additionally, we learned that some of these innate brain structures make it difficult for 9/11 Truth activists to present their evidence, as well as for listeners to receive this evidence openly.

    We continue Ms. Shure’s analysis in October with a dual offering — Part 10: Terror Management Theory, and Part 11: Systems Justification Theory. They examine, respectively, how the fear of our own death and the need to feel good about the cultural system in which we live create resistance to the evidence presented by 9/11 skeptics.

    Part 10: Terror Management Theory

    terror-mngt-theory-articleTerror Management Theory postulates that whenever we are introduced to information that reminds us of death — such as simply the mention of 9/11 — our anxiety increases, since we are reminded of our own inevitable death. This anxiety is called “mortality salience.” Studies show that our behavior immediately becomes more defensive when we are reminded of death. In turn, we become increasingly insecure. This normally causes us to show increased preference for members of our own group (the "in group") over out-group members; to show more “consensus bias,” or favoritism toward those who hold beliefs similar to our own; and to develop “compensatory conviction,” an inflated faith in our personal worldview, such as a bias toward our own country and religion.

    Therefore, when we skeptics try to educate people about 9/11, we provoke anxiety in our listeners since, unconsciously, we are reminding them of their own death. More defensive behaviors then ensue.

    In addition, if our listeners view us as members of a minority group, they usually resist what we are saying — at least initially. If, on the other hand, they view us as members of the majority group, they are more likely to accept our information. In other words, people like to be on the winning side, or in the middle of the bell curve, as we saw in Part 6: Conformity.

    As of this writing, skeptics of the official account of 9/11 are generally viewed as holding a minority opinion, but this need not remain the case. The good news is that research shows that information coming from a perceived minority group, although initially resisted, often exerts a hidden or delayed impact. When listeners hear dissenting views repeated, those views become more familiar. Thus, resistant individuals, when interviewed later, often show shifts in favor of the new information.1

    German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer intuitively understood this delayed impact when he wrote,

    Read more...
     
    A Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By Others
    Friday, 18 February 2011 12:49

    Editor's note: The following article on WTC 7, quite critical of the NIST report, appeared in the Foreign Policy Journal this week.


    This year will mark the 10th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 disaster. In these 10 years, not only have extremely important scientific questions about this tragedy gone unanswered, but they have even been ridiculed to the point of deranged absurdity. We owe a valid scientific explanation to the 3000 victims on that day, the steadily dying health-stricken first responders, the dead and wounded soldiers, and the untold thousands upon thousands of dead and injured Afghans and Iraqis resulting from the terrifying never-ending “war on terror”. Critics of those skeptical of the official story of 9/11 have often objected that an alternative theory has never been put forth. To that end, this article will put forth a scientific theory for one important aspect of the 9/11 event, the Building 7 collapse.

    photo: http://911research.wtc7.net

    On September 11, 2001 a third building came down. This building was 7 World Trade Center (WTC 7), a 47-story building about the width and length of a football field. NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, was tasked with officially explaining how WTC 7 fell. Their theory is documented in the report entitled Final Report of the Collapse of Building 7[1]. Many people are under the mistaken impression that NIST’s theory of how WTC 7 fell down is a valid scientific theory. In science however, a valid theory must be the simplest theory available that best explains all the available empirical data.[2] This article will show that the NIST theory is a highly convoluted theory that cannot explain important observations.

    Read more...
     
    Energetic Materials as a Potential Cause of the 9/11 First Responder Illnesses
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By Others
    Tuesday, 08 February 2011 14:55

    Originally published on http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/ February 4, 2011

     

    The tragedy at the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11th, 2001 continues to affect many thousands of first responders who sacrificed their own health while restoring lower Manhattan and attempting to recover survivors and victims’ remains. Recently, H.R. 847, otherwise known as the James Zadroga Bill, was signed by President Obama in an effort to provide services and compensation for those whose health was compromised through exposure to the toxic dust and gases at Ground Zero. However, these first responders also need help to understand how their illnesses originated so that improvements in treatment can be made. In response to this need, concerned citizens should consider the possible correlation between evidence for energetic materials at the WTC and the environmental exposures which appear to have caused so many illnesses in the first responders.

    Read more...
     
    Come to New York on Sept 11th!
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Written by AE911Truth Staff   
    Friday, 05 September 2014 16:32

    GFA-action-signs-300-webThis 9/11 anniversary is the thirteenth. We intend to make it the most effective effort yet. Our lineup of activities and speakers is incredible.

    But it needs you there. Can you get to New York to help us? Check out and download the full NYC schedule full NYC schedule for dates, times, and locations.

     


     

    Thursday, September 11 – NYC

    AE-Shop-DVD-Disc-Anatomy-175We start the day at 9:00 AM with a protest, complete with signs and banners, at the World Trade Center.

    Then we join AE911Truth founder Richard Gage for an 11:00 AM press conference, where every US citizen will be called upon to speak out publicly against the lies told to the world about the largest crime in America's history and will be asked to take back the reins of this country.

    Next we convene at 2:00 PM in East Village for the NYC Premiere of The Anatomy of a Great Deception, followed by a Q&A and remarks by special guest speakers.

    After the film showing, we participate in a "mini-march" up to Union Square, where educating the public about the truth of 9/11 continues.

    not-about-911At 8:00 PM, we're invited to attend the New York City premiere of the challenging play, "This is Not About 9/11," which addresses unanswered questions about the topic that causes most New Yorkers to go silent. The play, which has received rave reviews, was written by 9/11 family member Sarah Van Auken, daughter of one of the four Jersey Girls (9/11 widows), who lost her father that tragic day.

     


    Read more...
     
    Australian Author Links Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation to 9/11
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Written by Dalia Mae Lachlan   
    Sunday, 31 August 2014 20:14

    Editor's Note: We republish a brilliant little gem that reflects upon Newton's law of universal gravitation—a law that was still in effect on 9/11, judging by the photographic evidence. The article, written by "Down Under" blogger Dalia Mae Lachlan, was originally published in Flipside News. Lachlan, by the way, has also authored a series of children's books, "Awaken Your Kids" — one of which, "The Three Tall Buildings," helps youngsters understand what really happened on 9/11 so they can explain it to their parents. Sometimes that's the way the world wakes up.

    Empirical Observation of 9/11

    3-tall-buildings-poster-300pxThe Three Tall Buildings

    This is what a building collapse looks like. Even though the pillars of the building have been skillfully severed by explosives – everything of weight is going downwards.

    Newton's law of universal gravitation states that any two bodies in the universe attract each other with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This is a general physical law derived from empirical observations and was formulated in Newton’s work Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica ("the Principia"), first published on 5 July 1687.

    327 years later society, governments and the mainstream media seem to have a problem with Newton.

     

    Read more...

     
    << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

    Page 8 of 128