left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth
    Presenting the 9/11 Evidence Single-handedly
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Written by Dick Scar, BSAE   
    Sunday, 31 August 2014 20:10

    AE911Truth's Presenter Team "Star"

    Volunteer Spotlight: Stan Beattie

    Sstan-beattie-grayStan Beattie holds up David Ray Griffin's book, The New Pearl Harbor, for his audience to see at a recent 9/11 Truth presentation.tan Beattie, PE, a member of the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Presenter Team, became convinced that the official story of the events of September 11, 2001, was false after reading Dr. David Griffin’s book, The New Pearl Harbor, in 2004.

    He became so committed to sharing the truth with his fellow Americans that in 2007 he flew from his home outside Detroit, Michigan, to Washington, D.C., to join a protest on the Mall against the Bush surge of the Iraq War. While Stan was walking on the Mall, he met people from DC911Truth, signed their petition, and proudly held up one of their placards. Shortly thereafter, he watched AE911Truth's two-hour Blueprint for Truth. Since then, he has become both an active member of AE's Presenter Team and a financial contributor.

    Stan also supports Firefighters for 9/11 Truth. In fact, he has visited fire stations in Farmington Hills, near Detroit, and in Brooklyn, New York, and talked with the firefighters about 9/11. One of the people who came up to thank him after his presentation in Brighton, Michigan, said that his son had been to a firefighters' gathering, where the general feeling was that "controlled demolitions brought the buildings down."

    Read more...
     
    9/11 and Skeptic Magazine’s ‘Science’ of Controlled Demolitions
    Print
    E-mail
    News - Press Coverage
    Wednesday, 07 December 2011 15:20

    by Jeremy R. Hammond, Foreign Policy Journal, 11/16/11

    Editor’s note: Journalist Chris Mohr, an ardent defender of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, recently wrote an article for Skeptic Magazine in which he attempted to rebut several key pieces of evidence that prove the WTC skyscrapers were brought down by controlled demolition. Researcher Jeremy R. Hammond exposes the fallacies in Mohr’s arguments in this response published in the Foreign Policy Journal.

    Chris Mohr at Skeptic magazine writes that “conspiracists” are working hard to publicize their claims of scientific validity to the conjecture that the World Trade Center buildings were destroyed through controlled demolition.” He mentions a debate he had with Richard Gage, the founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, where more than 1,500 professional architects and engineers who question the official explanation for the collapse of the three World Trade Center buildings have signed a petition calling for a new—that is to say, a real—investigation. “I thought initially that Gage might be on to something,” Mohr writes, “until I examined his science carefully” and debated him. In his article, he lists his responses to the controlled-demolition hypothesis. Sticking to the question of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7), let’s examine Mohr’s arguments against the science behind the controlled-demolition hypothesis and in favor of the fire-induced collapse hypothesis. If you’re unfamiliar with WTC 7, you can watch it collapsing on 9/11 in the video below.

    Read more...
     
    High-Rise Safety Initiative Gets Fair Write-up, Finally!
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Written by Russ Baker   
    Sunday, 31 August 2014 20:06

    WhoWhatWhy.com informs readers of NYC ballot initiative

    Sept-newsletter-whowhatwhyEditor's Note: Investigative reporter Russ Baker launched the online publication WhoWhatWhy.com five years ago to do what he calls "forensic journalism"—that is, reporting that is "rigorous, relentless, and scientific." Sounds like a description of AE911Truth's research, doesn't it? In mid-August, Baker wrote an article about the NYC Coalition for Accountability NOW (NYC CAN), and interviewed its founder, Ted Walter. You can read the piece here:

     

    Putting a 9/11 Mystery on the Ballot

    I was standing blocks from Building 7 of the World Trade Center complex and staring directly at it when it collapsed.

    Read more...
     
    Small But Significant Triumph for 9/11 Truth Activist in UK Court
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By Others
    Thursday, 28 February 2013 15:15

    By Victoria N. Alexander, Digital Journal

    Editor’s Note: For more information about Tony Rooke’s court case and to find out how you can get involved in future efforts, send Tony an email. You can also listen to Tony’s radio interview on 9/11 Free Fall.

    In an act of civil disobedience, Tony Rooke refused to pay a £130 TV license fee, alleging that the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks. Facing a judge Monday, Rooke was not convicted and did not have to pay the fine.



    Rooke, a documentary maker who made his protest against the BBC in Horsham Magistrates’ Court in West Sussex, claims the BBC reported that World Trade Center 7 collapsed “due to an office fire, which, even the NIST Report says, fell at free-fall speed for eight floors in 2.5 seconds. That is absolutely impossible without a controlled demolition being involved.”

    Read more...
     
    Salon and Slate Magazines Confused Over 9/11 Facts
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By Others
    Thursday, 07 February 2013 19:07

    By Victoria N. Alexander, Digital Journal

    Editor’s Note: The controversy over the Salon article indicates that some members of the mainstream media are aware of the scientific evidence presented by AE911Truth and are attempting to get the word out to the public about the melted iron and steel that were found at Ground Zero. We hope that in the future, these news sources examine the evidence surrounding the 9/11 attacks – as well as other tragic acts of violence – before dismissing those who question them. (Note: Melting points listed in the article are open air temperatures.)

    Last Tuesday, Salon magazine published an article expressing sympathy for the 9/11 Truth movement, titled "Give Truthers a Chance: Not all conspiracy theorists are as crazy and absurd as Alex Jones and the Sandy Hook truthers would have you think."

    Read more...
     
    << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

    Page 2 of 125