"It's hard for me to believe [WTC 7] came down by itself...[9/11] couldn't possibly have been done the way the government told us."
- Andrew Napolitano on the show Infowars November 23, 2010
Here is FOX TV's Judge Napolitano interviewing Geraldo Rivera on Friday 11/19/10 asking Geraldo about his very controversial segment on WTC 7 with Bob McIlvaine & Tony Szamboti on his show the week before.
"What caught my eye is their claim (BuildingWhat? campaign) that more than 1,300 architects and engineers examined the evidence about Building 7 and disagree with the official report issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology."
- Geraldo Rivera, Fox News November 13, 2010
“BuildingWhat?” Appears on Geraldo At Large on FOX News
"READ MORE" to see AE911Truth's response to Mr. Rivera at the end of this post
On November 13, Bob McIlvaine and Tony Szamboti appeared on Geraldo Rivera's show "Geraldo At Large" on Fox News to talk about the "BuildingWhat?" TV ad campaign and World Trade Center Building 7for a short segment.
Bob McIlvaine lost his son Bobby McIlvaine on September 11, 2001. He is an active member of NYC CAN, a group that co-sponsors the "BuildingWhat?" TV ad campaign. Tony Szamboti is a mechanical engineer and signer of the petition at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a group of more than 1,350 professionals calling for a new independent investigation into the destruction of Building 7 and the twin towers.
It’s true! The Democratic Platform for the state of Colorado is the first major party in the US to adopt a resolution for a new investigation into the official story of the events surrounding 9/11.
It started in 2004 when I, a complete novice in political processes, decided to participate in my precinct caucus in order to try to make a difference here in Colorado.1The night before, I learned that the caucus is also a time to bring policy resolutions for consideration.Hurriedly, I wrote a resolution for a new, independent investigation into 9/11, figuring that here is an opportunity, at least, to educate a few more people.To my surprise, my precinct caucus neighbors voted for it!
Many people who think they have been keeping up with the revelations of the last several years about the destruction of the three high-rises in New York City on Sept. 11, 2001, will nonetheless be surprised to discover that the falling upper section of WTC 1 exhibited no measurable deceleration when it impacted the lower section. This is a startling revelation because it adds to the collection of “smoking guns” proving that the “collapse” of that building was not caused by the jetliner impact and ensuing fires.
Although theoretically possible, collapses of heavily constructed buildings like the Twin Towers and WTC 7 had never occurred prior to Sept. 11, 2001, without some form of “assistance.” The reason for this is that they are built with significant reserve strength. The construction of each floor is designed to support several times the actual load above it.
Over the last century, the most astounding historical discoveries of man-made artifacts have often been accomplished by well-funded, highly experienced researchers. From the excavation of King Tut’s tomb to the sighting of the sunken Titanic, stunning finds have required immense financial and human resources, as well as leadership by distinguished explorers. So, how did a mountain of never-before-seen footage used in NIST’s World Trade Center investigations get exposed to the light of day last month? Was it the work of a billionaire adventurer? Not quite. You can thank an upstart non-profit, the International Center for 9/11 Studies, whose efforts have at last borne fruit.
The International Center for 9/11 Studies was founded in 2008 by Director James Gourley, a Texas lawyer who began questioning the events of 9/11 after watching a presentation given by David Ray Griffin on C-SPAN.
Do you know the official story of the 9/11 terror attacks to be false?
Are you aware of the overwhelming implications of this?
Have you ever experienceddifficulties convincing people to take a second look at 9/11?
If you answered YES, read on.
AE911Truth Overcomes Normal Skepticism in 10 Minutes!
Your easiest way to convince a skeptic of the legitimacy of questioning 9/11 would arguably be to draw her/his attention to a single event in the official narrative that:
• Could easily be exposed as false • Would be 9/11’s defining moment and • Fully lent itself to a straightforward counter-explanation buttressed by hundreds of professionals and a team of experts who would be available to personally clarify the above.
Leave a copy of the 9/11 Investigator for someone at your coffee shop!
A recent post on our Facebook page presented the idea to “Adopt a Coffee Shop!” The concept is simple. All of our supporters are encouraged to visit local coffee shops in their area regularly and leave behind copies our new AE911Truth broadsheet newspaper, the 9/11 Investigator. The Facebook post, which generated more than 90 “likes” and 9 “comments”, outlined the following three easy steps:
1) Visit our online store and buy some copies of the Investigator. While you’re there, consider getting some “street ready” flyers as well.
2) Take your materials to the coffee shops in your area, leave a few Investigators, and put a flyer on the bulletin board.