Richard Gage, AIA, advocate of the "explosive controlled demolition" theory

In this historic struggle to uncover and spread awareness of the truth regarding 9/11, a resounding call has been made for respectful, reasoned debate. Unfortunately, it has been difficult to find defenders of the official story who will acknowledge in a scientific and sincere manner the troubling forensic evidence that we present. The officials at NIST who put forth the government sponsored story should be willing to defend it in debate, but they are not. So, we are pleased that a clearly sincere, amicable, dynamic speaker is willing to oppose us in what promises to be a debate of a refreshingly different character.

Independent 9/11 investigator and debate organizer, Fran Shure

Gage noted, “I’m looking forward to debating someone who has an open mind and is respectful of our position, yet who firmly believes that the twin towers were brought down by a “natural collapse” due to fire and jet planes. I expect a lively, intriguing debate that promises to emerge as one of the most productive public discussions of 9/11 to date. Chris has already shown himself to be a formidable opponent and I eagerly await a congenial conversation with him of a kind that NIST officials have not granted us."

Mohr held his own in the INN World Report Debate – and gave Gage new material and claims to research. Mohr has examined the NIST reports, found them to be flawed, and is deeply interested in determining the truth about this pivotal event.

Both Mohr and Mr. Gage will have PowerPoint presentations. The debate is scheduled to last two hours with questions and answers afterwards. We are thankful to Fran Shure of Colorado 9/11 Visibility for her diligent efforts in organizing this event. A professional film crew with three cameras will be recording the debate, so this important educational material can later be presented to a much wider audience in the form of a DVD.