Attend a Presidential Campaign Speech Q&A to
Put AE911Truth Question in the Spotlight

What began in Iowa on Tuesday, January 3, 2012 and will continue to June 26 is an American tradition that AE911Truth needs you to participate in. Americans will be heading to their caucuses and primaries to select their preferred Presidential candidate. There are currently many Republican candidates traversing states and making local appearances in small venues. This gives you, the supporters of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a unique accessible opportunity to interact with the candidates and to make a simple statement or ask a simple question to educate and pin them down on the issue of a new investigation and have them state their stance – publicly, and ideally in front of the media. You can find the candidate’s web-sites to see where they will be meeting voters near you.

While Republican candidates are approachable during this Presidential primary season, once the campaign begins in earnest, President Obama and all other candidates for public office will be entertaining questions and comments from you, the public.

Because it is important to engage the candidate and the other people in attendance with as much finesse as possible, we suggest:

Option 1: (A statement)

This statement is fairly concise yet includes the important detail that we are not alone in our call for a real investigation. By not asking a specific question, and thereby not eliciting a response, it may very well have more impact during the awkward moment following with the audience, media, and the candidate himself.

[Senator/Governor/Representative or other appropriate title] ___________:

Many 9/11 victims family members have called for a real investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and high-rise Building 7. Even Bob Graham, Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has called for further investigation into the 9/11 attacks. Several of the 9/11 Commissioners cast doubts on their own report, complaining of a lack of cooperation by the Bush Administration and outright lies from top military officers. One Commissioner resigned in protest, refusing to be part of another government whitewash, which he later termed a “national scandal.”

Numerous 9/11 family members support the 1,600 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth who are demanding a new investigation into the explosive destruction of the three high-rises.

We look forward to your support with this vital American issue when you become president.

Thank you!

OPTION 2: (A question)

[Senator/Governor/Representative or other appropriate title] _________:

I have a question about your commitment to openness and transparency of the governmental process that we Americans have come to expect.

More than 1600 independent architects and engineers are calling for a real investigation of the destruction of the World Trade Center twin towers and the lesser-known Building 7 on 9/11. It is inexcusable that a scientifically valid engineering investigation into these events, considering all available evidence, has not yet occurred.  For example, NIST admitted that Building 7 experienced freefall, which rules out fire as the explanation. Yet, they have refused to test dust samples for residues of incendiaries and/or explosives, as is required by national guidelines for fire and explosion investigation in all 50 states. These 1600 architects and engineers cite overwhelming evidence of explosive controlled demolition – and they are backed by family members of 9/11 victims.

When you are elected President will you actively support openness and transparency by launching an investigation that includes evidence compiled by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth?

Because the typical response to someone questioning 9/11 is either a non-response, or a dismissal by saying “that question is an insult to the American People,” “That question doesn’t deserve an answer,” etc. we need to frame the question carefully and stick to the facts. Don't try to engage in other public back and forth about any other 9/11 issues except to get a “Yes” from the candidate. Don’t stop until you get a “Yes” or a “No.” If you get a “No” then it would be appropriate to ask:

“Does that mean that you do not support an open and transparent government for the American People in which government engineers must base their reports on science and physics?”

After your public question, make whatever materials you have available for distribution to others. Bring copies of the 9/11: Blueprint for Truth DVDs or the 15-minute mini-DVD documentary on WTC 7 with Ed Asner, the street brochure, the 9/11 Investigator newspaper. Hand them out to those who heard your question and are curious – and of course the candidate too.

Print out the above and practice reading it out loud. Please try to have an associate or friend with you in order to record your statement on video. You never know when one of these candidates is going to actually voice support for a new investigation. Even their denials are important to document. We will post the results on our website. Please use our Contact Us page to send us your results and any feedback.

Thank you for taking action.

Congressional Outreach Team
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Primary/Caucus Calendar — Republican Party

From Wikipedia. This data contains the candidate web-sites:

Major candidates

Michele Bachmann, Minnesota Declared Jun. 27, 2011 U.S. Rep. from MN

Newt Gingrich, Georgia Declared May 11, 2011 Fmr. Speaker of the House

Jon Huntsman, Utah Declared Jun. 21, 2011 Fmr. Gov. of UT

Ron Paul, Texas Declared May 13, 2011 U.S. Rep. from TX

Rick Perry, Texas Declared Aug. 13, 2011 Gov. of TX

Mitt Romney, Massachusetts Declared Jun. 2, 2011 Fmr. Gov. of MA

Rick Santorum, Pennsylvania Declared Jun. 6, 2011 Fmr. U.S. Senator for PA

Primary/Caucus Calendar — Democratic Party

It is expected that with only one viable candidate running, Democratic primaries are not likely to engender campaign opportunities where questions can be asked. But if the opportunity arises, take action!