|
|
|
|
|
| Chip Franklin - Interview with Richard Gage AIA |
| NIST Admits Freefall
|
| Oct 15, 2008 Audio Archive: |
|
Watch the Interview
|
|
BlogTalkRadio Interview
|
|
|
|
|
Video INN World Report- September 18, 2007 Richard Gage AIA (14:55 minutes into broadcast)|
9/11 Blueprint: The Architecture of Destruction
|
|
We The People Radio Network,
|
|
Truth Revolution Radio Interviews
|
|
Info Item
Aug 21, 2009
[Ed: Copy of original letter dated July 20, 2009] Dear Dr. Sunder, We have heard you state publicly after the WTC 7 press conference that it "would not be productive" for you to meet with the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. This is quite disappointing – as we now have over 700 architects and engineers at AE911Truth calling for a real investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11. At what point will you take us seriously? Perhaps when our rapidly growing numbers reach 1,000 A/E's? Here are our talking points: 1. The NIST November 2008 Final WTC 7 Investigative Report has many fatal flaws: a. NIST was forced to acknowledge the free-fall collapse of Building 7 for 100 feet of its 6.5 second fall only after being grilled publicly by experts who are petition signers of AE911Truth. Yet you do not acknowledge the obvious implications of such free-fall collapse – that the structure had to have been removed – forcibly – by explosives. (Anyone knows that a building cannot collapse at the rate of a freely falling object while simultaneously crushing 40,000 tons of structural steel – because all of its gravitational potential energy has been converted to motion.)
|
|
|
|
View
|
