YouTube video, “9/11 Experiments: The mysterious ‘eutectic steel’“ by Jonathan Cole, P.E. Normal building materials such as gypsum wallboard were packed next to a steel I-beam and subjected to intense heat – all to see if the gypsum wall board “attacked” the steel as claimed by some. It didn’t.

Contents
Engineer Does for Free what NIST Couldn’t for Millions
AE911Truth Online Store – Stock Full of Technical Documents
Why Progressives Should Press for Building-7 Exposure
9/11 Truth Presented at Advanced Wealth Conference in Jamaica
Taming the Beast: A Short History of the AE911Truth Debates
Mainstream Media Implodes on 9/11 along with WTC 7
AE911Truth Heats up the 9/11 Truth Choir in Sizzling Tucson
AE911Truth to Hit the Road Delivering the EXPLOSIVE Evidence

– Dick Scar

Appendix C of May 2002 BPAT Report

One of several burning questions surrounding the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 was: “Where did the sulfur come from that melted some of the structural steel members from the building so much that they looked more like “Swiss cheese”? Sulfur reduces the melting point of iron by producing a eutectic mixture. The New York Times called these pieces of melted steel “perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation.” FEMA documented the “intergranular melting, rapid oxidation, and sulfidation” of the steel members in Appendix C of their May 2002 Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT) Report, yet offered no explanation for this phenomena which required temperatures far in excess of that which office fires or jet fuel could have provided.

– Online Store Volunteer Staff

29 Structural/Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Demolition – Spiral Bound

As of July 2010, more than 1,200 architects and engineers have joined the call by AE911Truth for a new investigation, faulting the official reports and documenting the explosive evidence for the destruction of the 3 WTC high-rises on 9/11. This exclusive 13-page article includes seven pages of fascinating interviews along with six pages of biographical info about 29, of over 60 total, structural/civil engineers who are extensively quoted in the article.

– Dwain Deets

Progressives should press for exposure of the problems related to the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. (An abbreviated set of seven of these problems are available at the 7problemswithbuilding7.info website, and over 1,200 architects and engineers are calling for a new investigation.) Thus far, these problems have been mostly hidden from the public. Exposure could provide a rallying point for efforts to bring accountability and justice in America. It can bring clarity to the press for transparency in government, and it can expose corporate Machiavellian manipulations that have clearly gone on relative to Building 7’s collapse.

– Richard Gage, AIA

Kip Herriage & Karl Bessey of Wealth Masters Int'l bring 9/11 Truth to their top associates

AE911Truth was flown into Jamaica earlier this month to present the evidence for the explosive destruction of the three WTC skyscrapers to their top 250 associates. Why? Wealth Masters International is a company of 20,000 associates seeking to build and maintain their wealth in the face of a declining economy and the largest wealth transfer in history.

Kip Herriage and Karl Bessey are the leaders of this unique wealth oriented company, who brought AE911Truth to this annual conference in order to give their followers very sensitive information that few other Wall Street gurus dare to understand or to provide. Their associates came together for four days to take a hard look at the light as well as dark sides of our national and world economy, and the opportunities available to savvy investors. They brought together a collection of other leaders, like Mike Maloney of GoldSilver.com, and G. Edward Griffin, author of The Creature from Jekyll Island, and a host of other leaders in the areas of investment and health.

– Shawn Hamilton

Ron Craig

Soon after Richard Gage, AIA, became interested in the subject of the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11, he began debating critics who felt qualified to challenge the explosive evidence. Gage twice debated Ron Craig (International Society of Explosives Engineers), as well as Mark Roberts (tour guide), Michael Shermer (founder of Skeptic Magazine), and Dave Thomas (mathematician and physicist).

The first debate, between Richard Gage, AIA, and Ron Craig, took place on November 12, 2007, on “The Richard Syrett Show,” in Toronto. Gage argued that explosives had been used to bring down the buildings and cited several points of explosive evidence such as the discovery of thermite in the debris, witness testimony citing explosions, beams hurled six hundred feet, and the free-fall of WTC building 7.

– Dwain Deets

Peter Jennings reflecting on Building 7 collapse approx. 20 minutes later

The shocking collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11 caused great alarm, not only in the architectural and engineering community (among those who have become aware of it) but with mainstream media – right from day one. While Dan Rather’s commentary on the remarkable collapse (that it looked like it was knocked down by well placed dynamite) is more often quoted, Peter Jennings also had similar thoughts as he reflected on the shocking 47-story collapse shortly after the event.

Jennings showed the building coming down in slow motion. As he reflected on the enormity of it he said, “Well, there’s Building 7 coming down. When you think that part of the component of news coverage around the country every year is the excitement, the fun, that people get watching an old building being demolished, and they wire it very carefully for days. It’s a very careful operation in order to make sure a building comes down safely. I think the last one we saw was when they brought down one of the old casinos in Las Vegas. It’s just stunning to see these buildings come down… and now, number seven World Trade Center which is 47 stories tall.”

– Thomas Costanzo

Richard Gage, AIA on “Gnosis” Radio

Richard Gage, AIA, begin his visit to Tucson at full throttle. He immediately visited the studio of AM1330 “Gnosis” Radio, where host Chuck Aubrey interviewed him prior to the 9/11: Blueprint for Truth presentation that evening. A video taken in the studio is archived on 911Blogger here.

This is the second time I have seen the dynamic presentation of Richard Gage, AIA. I have also attended numerous other lectures about the inconsistencies which occurred on 9/11. Gage does an excellent job of explaining the subject of 9/11 by focusing completely on the destruction of the high-rises. He does not attempt to place blame and thereby maintains the credibility of the AE911Truth organization of professional architects and engineers. Only the anomalies in the government reports and the physical evidence are discussed — and they are overwhelming. There needs to be a new investigation. There is such a large mountain of data on the subject that one could spend an incredible amount of time researching all the facts involved. What Gage does very effectively is narrow the talk down to a very specific set of facts, all of which are easily understandable to a person of normal intelligence.

We are a non–partisan association of architects, engineers, and affiliates.

Our work at AE911Truth is dedicated to the victims, families and all others throughout the world affected by the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and its aftermath.

Our mission is to research, compile, and disseminate scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the 3 WTC skyscrapers, calling for a truly open and independent investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice.

Learn more about us.   Contact us if you have questions or comments.

Please forward and distribute widely!

Thank you.

Editor in Chief, Dwain Deets / Web Implementation, Tania Torres

Unsubscribe or Update Your Profile

Copyright © 2010 AE911Truth All rights reserved.