|
•
Proceed at your own pace!
|
|
Watch the Interview
|
|
Parts I & II – "WTC Building #7 and Twin Towers – Controlled Demolitions?"
|
|
Alex Jones Interview
|
|
BlogTalkRadio Interview
|
|
|
|
|
Video INN World Report- September 18, 2007 Richard Gage AIA (14:55 minutes into broadcast)|
9/11 Blueprint: The Architecture of Destruction
|
|
We The People Radio Network,
|
|
Truth Revolution Radio Interviews
|
|
Announcements
Aug 22, 2007
Original Content at www.opednews.com/articles/genera alan mil 070820 former chief of nist Dr. Quintiere made his plea during his presentation, "Questions on the WTC Investigations" at the 2007 World Fire Safety Conference. "I wish that there would be a peer review of this," he said, referring to the NIST investigation. "I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they've done; both structurally and from a fire point of view." "I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable," explained Dr. Quintiere. "Let's look at real alternatives that might have been the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Towers and how that relates to the official cause and what's the significance of one cause versus another."
Jul 16, 2007
Contact: Richard Gage, AIA, Founding Member of AE911Truth.org “We are proud to have the support of Marx Ayres, a nationally recognized expert in building energy systems and earthquake damage to building nonstructural systems, in our search for the truth about the events of 9/11.”, said Mr. Gage. “He has signed our petition requesting a reinvestigation of those tragic events and he has now gone even further by providing his personal statement of support for a new investigation of 9/11.” Mr. Ayres is a nationally recognized expert in building air conditioning design and analysis, energy conservation, thermal energy storage, commissioning of HVAC systems, and earthquake damage to building mechanical systems, with over 55 years of experience. Co-founder of one of the largest building engineering firms in Los Angeles, Mr. Ayres has been in responsible charge of the design of hundreds of major building projects, including high rise offices, commercial centers, hospitals and laboratories, hotels and residential buildings, universities and colleges, schools, theaters and entertainment centers, jails and correctional facilities, TV and sound studios, governmental buildings and industrial facilities. In his statement, Mr. Ayres wrote, “I support the work of Dr. Steven Jones. He has provided a scientific foundation for the collapse of the three World Trade Center (WTC) towers. I read the FEMA September, 2002 report, prepared by the American Society of Civil Engineers, and initially accepted their theory of the collapse of WTC 1 and 2. As more information became available on the web, I was motivated to research the subject in a more rigorous manner. I have carefully studied the Jones 2006 paper, “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?” and concluded that it is a rational step-by-step study that meets the accepted standards for scientific building research. His critical reviews of the FEMA, NIST, and 9/11 Commission reports are correct.” Mr. Ayres continues, “Steven Jones’ call for a ‘serious investigation’ of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fire, but through the use of pre-positioned “cutter-charges” must be the rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out.” Dr. Steven Jones is in the forefront of independent scientific researchers investigating the events of 9/11. A former professor of physics at Brigham Young University, his research indicates that the World Trade Center skyscrapers were destroyed not as a result of the impact of airplanes, but rather the result of intentional, controlled demolitions using precisely timed detonations of pre-planted explosives. In fact, one of the skyscrapers, 610 foot tall, 47-story, WTC Building 7, was not even hit by an airplane, yet it disintegrated and fell into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds. It is of interest to note that Building 7 was not even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission’s "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.” And in the almost six years since 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of Building 7’s collapse. For more information about Dr. Steven Jones’ research on the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings, please visit Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice website at http://stj911.org/index.html Shown below is Mr. Ayres full statement, which will be made available on the AE911T.org website with this press release. Statement of J. Marx Ayres, MSME, P.E. July 16, 2007 "I am a consulting mechanical engineer with over 55 years of experience in the design and construction of all types of buildings including high-rise office towers. I am an expert in heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) and fire protection for buildings. I have authored 41 technical papers and I am a chapter author in 3 books covering HVAC systems, building and energy requirements, solar heating and cooling applications, thermal energy storage and earthquake damage to building nonstructural systems. I support the work of Dr. Steven Jones. He has provided a scientific foundation for the collapse of the three World Trade Center (WTC) towers. I read the FEMA September, 2002 report, prepared by the American Society of Civil Engineers, and initially accepted their theory of the collapse of WTC 1 and 2. As more information became available on the web, I was motivated to research the subject in a more rigorous manner. I have carefully studied the Jones 2006 paper, “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?” and concluded that it is a rational step-by-step study that meets the accepted standards for scientific building research. His critical reviews of the FEMA, NIST, and 9/11 Commission reports are correct. I have signed his petition calling for the release of all U.S. Government- held information regarding the events of 9/11/2001. Steven Jones’ call for a “serious investigation” of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fire, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges” must be the rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out. Dr. Jones is following in the footsteps of Dr. Linus Pauling of the California Institute of Technology, who rallied his fellow scientists to oppose the development of the Hydrogen Bomb and the testing of nuclear weapons. He was later awarded the 1962 Nobel Peace Prize for these efforts."
May 31, 2007
A group of activists/researchers in NYC are working to create a ballot initiative enabling city residents to vote in the Nov. 6th general election in favor of a new, independent investigation of 9/11. As of now, international attorney Dr. William Pepper, former astronaut Edgar Mitchell, physics professor Dr. Steven Jones, Ret. Col. Robert Bowman, former senator Lincoln Chafee, Jersey widow Lorie Van Auken, Native American author/activist Splitting-the-Sky, investigative reporter Wayne Madsen, and executive director of the Bertrand Russell Tribunal, Ralph Schoenman, have agreed to participate as Commissioners. We are searching for a licensed mechanical engineer or architect who has extensive credentials, especially in construction of steel-framed buildings, for what would be a paid position as a Commissioner. We'll also need others to serve as expert witnesses. We are now gearing up for the petition drive which will require 30,000 signatures. Then the proposal/referendum gets presented to NY City Council for their approval. If they vote against it, then another 15,000 signatures will override their decision. Since all we are asking for is a new investigation which is desired by 66% of New Yorkers according to an Aug. '05 Zogby poll, plus the fact that we're in touch with some large organizations who will help, our task is very feasible. Why is this effort necessary? A multitude of details have surfaced indicating the 9/11 Commission Report was nothing more than a restatement of the official account, rather than a true open-ended investigation which pursued all areas of inquiry. It began with a promise to give a full account of the events, then turned into an effort to avoid placing blame at all costs. To this day, no one has been held accountable. Additionally, 9/11 has been exploited to erroneously justify criminal acts of war abroad, police state measures at home, and used by the Bush neocons to create an imperial presidency. Now New Yorkers can take matters into their own hands. We can enable NYC voters to have the choice to create what the government has failed to do. Obtaining a new investigation of 9/11 is our right, and is our obligation to the cause for truth, transparency, and accountability in government. This will be truly historic. Please contact Les Jamieson at info@nyc911initiative.org.
May 22, 2007
May 19, 2007
We'll bring the educational presentation right to your architectural or engineering firm on Friday at noon! See for yourself what the buzz is all about. We'll cover the fatal flaws in the 9/11 Commission Report, the FEMA Report, and the NIST Report's review of the "collapse" of the Twin Towers and the WTC building #7. We'll discuss the pulverization of concrete and the discovery of tons of molten metal in the basements of all 3 buildings. We'll see if there is indeed direct evidence of thermate cutter charges left on the WTC steel and dust. We'll even provide a great lunch - courtesy of our numerous supporters! Download the PDF brochure here. Let us know which Friday works best for you! If you are outside of the SF Bay Area then contact us for special arrangements to visit your firm or city to bring the controversial and crucial message of the evidence for controlled demolition in the WTC high-rise "collapses" that is taking the A/E community by storm! |
|
|
|
View
|
