left-panel-lighter-heading
    9-11-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out

    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    RT TV Show Interviews AE911Truth Experts About ReThink911 Campaign


    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, questions the official story of the collapse of the World Trade Center High-rises

    Ben Swann, formerly of Cincinnati's FOX19, has to admit that World Trade Center Building 7 probably did not collapse due to normal office fires as NIST would want us to believe


    Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7)

    Architects & Engineers:
    Solving the Mystery of WTC 7
    A 15-min Documentary with Ed Asner


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (4-minute trailer)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence -
    Experts Speak Out - Trailer
    Duration: 4:09


    9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out (58 minute free version)

    9/11: Explosive Evidence
    Experts Speak Out
    Free 1-hour version


    FOX TV, Fresno, with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX TV, Fresno,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CBC the fifth estate unofficial story

    CBC - The Fifth Estate
    "The Unofficial Story"


    The Reality Report with Richard Gage

    The Reality Report
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    CCTV, with Richard Gage, AIA

    CCTV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    FOX News with Richard Gage, AIA

    FOX News
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Vancouver Omni TV,
    with Richard Gage, AIA


    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event

    Richard Gage Live on TV3 - The Masterplan Event


    Read it at AE911Truth.org
    World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth
    The Audacity of Hope: Restoring Science to 9/11
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Friday, 20 February 2009 19:00

    Our government must correct all of the errors in their multiple studies of the collapse of these buildings. To do that, scientific integrity must be restored!

    The Audacity of Hope: Restoring Science to 9/11
    Crockett Grabbe

    President Barack Obama's inaugural promise that "We will restore science to it rightful place..." sounds like good news. In our article "Science in the Bush: When Politics Replaces Physics," published on the web in September of 2007 [1], Lenny Charles and I pointed out how scientific integrity had been placed well behind politics in analysis, not only in areas such as climate change and public health issues, but also particularly in analysis of the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001.

    Read more...
     
    Mandarin Oriental Hotel compared to WTC 7 — Dramatic Differences
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Friday, 20 February 2009 19:00


    Mandarin Oriental Hotel fire, February 9, 2009,
    during and after the fire.

    With the fiery inferno of the Mandarin Oriental Hotel (MOH) in Beijing on February 9, 2009, the obvious point of comparison is with World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) on September 11, 2001. Yes, the buildings were very similar in size, and in some ways in construction. Their heights were comparable, 522 ft. for MOH, vs. 610 ft. for WTC 7. But the differences in the magnitude of the fires and ultimate results were dramatic, in the extreme.

    Read more...
     
    Exotic High Tech Explosives Positively Identified in World Trade Center Dust
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Saturday, 04 April 2009 19:00

    A ground-breaking scientific paper confirmed this week that red-gray flakes found throughout multiple samples of WTC dust are actually unexploded fragments of nanothermite, an exotic high-tech explosive.

    The samples were taken from far-separated locations in Manhattan, some as early as 10 minutes after the second tower (WTC 1) collapsed, ruling out any possible contamination from cleanup operations.

    Authored by an international team of physicists, chemists, and others, the research paper was titled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe." It was published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Vol. 2., and is available online for free download. The lead author is Niels H. Harrit of the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen.

    Read more...
     
    Two Seconds That Will Live in Infamy
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Saturday, 14 March 2009 19:00


    Gov. Gary Locke, nominee for Secretary of Commerce

    NIST's Half-Admission of Yet Another 9/11 Smoking Gun

    The U.S. Senate will hold a confirmation hearing this week on the nominee for Secretary of Commerce, Gov. Gary Locke. This cabinet position oversees the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST), the government agency responsible for investigating and reporting on the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7. NIST tried to avoid admitting that there was any freefall acceleration when the building came down on September 11, 2001. All the way to their draft final report on August 26, 2008, nearly seven years after the event, the NIST report's lead authors held firmly to their position that freefall did not occur.

    Once NIST invited comments on its draft report, it was more or less forced to accept the indisputable explanations based on the publicly available videos proving that freefall had occurred. David Chandler, a high school physics teacher and AE911Truth researcher, provided the most compelling argument in a video seen widely on YouTube.

    Read more...
     
    AE911Truth referenced in Slate Magazine
    Print
    E-mail
    News - News Releases By AE911Truth
    Thursday, 09 April 2009 19:00

    In an article titled, "Heated Controversy", the somewhat mainstream media web publication, Slate, looks at firefighters and their opinions of the official reports concerning the events of 9/11.

    "Do other professions marshal their own expertise to poke holes in the official story? Absolutely. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth point to the physics of the towers' collapse — its "free fall" pace, the "lateral ejection" of steel, the "mid-air pulverization of concrete" — as evidence that they could not have fallen exclusively because of the planes' impact."

    For the full story, see http://www.slate.com/id/2215703/.

     
    << Start < Prev 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 Next > End >>

    Page 92 of 117