46% Suspect Controlled Demolition of Building 7 after Seeing Footage
On the 12th anniversary of 9/11, a new national survey by the polling firm YouGov reveals that one in two Americans have doubts about the government’s account of 9/11. In addition, after viewing video footage of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse, 46% suspect that it was caused by a controlled demolition.
Send Us Your Twelfth Anniversary Photos, Videos, and Stories!
by Pamela Senzee & the ReThink911 Volunteers
Want to join up with AE911Truth and be even more effective in your 9/11 truth outreach? Become an AE911Truth Local Contact or form an AE911Truth Action Group! We can put you in touch with our supporters in your area – and vice versa – so why feel isolated? As a Local Contact, you will be listed on our website so that 9/11 Truth activists in your area can find you and email you. You simply need to be familiar with the WTC evidence and become aligned with our mission. It's simple and free, and we make it almost seamless!
Editor's Note: You can find out more about this informative new documentary at 911inAcademia.com.
Coming this fall, 9/11 in the Academic Community, a winner at the University of Toronto Film Festival, is a unique film that documents academia’s treatment of critical perspectives on 9/11. It explores the taboo that has been effective in shielding the American government’s narrative of the events of 9/11 from scholarly examination. Through a powerful reflection on intellectual courage and the purpose of academia, the film aims at changing intellectual discourse on 9/11 and the War on Terror.
Editor’s note: Journalist Chris Mohr, an ardent defender of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, recently wrote an article for Skeptic Magazine in which he attempted to rebut several key pieces of evidence that prove the WTC skyscrapers were brought down by controlled demolition. Researcher Jeremy R. Hammond exposes the fallacies in Mohr’s arguments in this response published in the Foreign Policy Journal.
Chris Mohr at Skeptic magazine writes that “conspiracists” are working hard to publicize their claims of scientific validity to the conjecture that the World Trade Center buildings were destroyed through controlled demolition.” He mentions a debate he had with Richard Gage, the founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, where more than 1,500 professional architects and engineers who question the official explanation for the collapse of the three World Trade Center buildings have signed a petition calling for a new—that is to say, a real—investigation. “I thought initially that Gage might be on to something,” Mohr writes, “until I examined his science carefully” and debated him. In his article, he lists his responses to the controlled-demolition hypothesis. Sticking to the question of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7), let’s examine Mohr’s arguments against the science behind the controlled-demolition hypothesis and in favor of the fire-induced collapse hypothesis. If you’re unfamiliar with WTC 7, you can watch it collapsing on 9/11 in the video below.