Author: admin

f you made this story up, a lot of people wouldn’t believe it.

And a lot of people don’t.

The supposed “mastermind” of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, still has not been convicted of anything despite having spent the past two decades in the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Charges against him and four others (Walid bin Attash, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, Ammar al-Baluchi, and Mustafa Ahmad al Hawsawi) were announced in 2008 with proceedings starting in June of that year. Incredibly, 16 years later the cases have not advanced past the pre-trial phase.

f you made this story up, a lot of people wouldn’t believe it.

And a lot of people don’t.

The supposed “mastermind” of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, still has not been convicted of anything despite having spent the past two decades in the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Charges against him and four others (Walid bin Attash, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, Ammar al-Baluchi, and Mustafa Ahmad al Hawsawi) were announced in 2008 with proceedings starting in June of that year. Incredibly, 16 years later the cases have not advanced past the pre-trial phase.

On July 23, new footage of the Twin Towers’ destruction on September 11, 2001, was uploaded to YouTube.

The uploader, Kei Sugimoto, describes the video: “Footage I filmed of the World Trade Center collapsing on 9/11/2001. Filmed from the roof of 64 St Marks Place in NYC on a Sony VX2000 with teleconverter. For historical archival purposes only.”

According to a comment he left under the video, Sugimoto rediscovered the footage when cleaning out a closet.

Recently, AE911Truth chairman Roland Angle was invited by the citizens group Stand Up for Idaho to present his research on the role played by members of the engineering profession in the cover-up of the World Trade Center evidence. (Follow the link below to watch the presentation.)

In the upcoming chapter of Angle’s book The Engineering the 9/11 Cover-Up, he provides an overview of the engineers who appear to have played a part in the cover-up.

Stand Up for Idaho, which addresses issues of concern to rural communities in middle America, explained it this way:

“The presentation will describe the process by which this colossal fraud has been foisted off on the public by using the leading engineering organizations to construct a false narrative that does not stand up to scientific inquiry. The details of this process will be clearly described and explained.”

On the last episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy SAlmost a decade ago, we got the infamous “28 pages.”

These came from the report of the congressional “Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11” and appeared to implicate Saudi Arabia in the 9/11 “attacks.”

Some in the 9/11 Truth Movement saw this as an opening for a re-investigation of the event, while others saw it as a limited hangout – designed to reinforce the idea that al-Qaeda terrorists were really behind 9/11 as the official story contends.

In June, we got a new chapter in the saga when a video shot in 1999 was unsealed in federal court as part of the legal action by 9/11 family members against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for its alleged role in 9/11.teele was joined by AE911Truth board member Kamal Obeid to discuss the organization’s bold new initiative – the Scientific Integrity Act, which is legislation currently being drafted by AE911Truth that would require that scientific reports issued by the federal government be accurate and true (as well as giving standing to American citizens who wish to challenge inaccurate reports in court).

On this week’s show, AE chairman Roland Angle discusses not only the Act but also important instances of scientific dispute between professionals and the federal government that the legislation would impact, as well as the recent Chevron ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court curtailing the power of federal agencies.

On the last episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele was joined by AE911Truth board member Kamal Obeid to discuss the organization’s bold new initiative – the Scientific Integrity Act, which is legislation currently being drafted by AE911Truth that would require that scientific reports issued by the federal government be accurate and true (as well as giving standing to American citizens who wish to challenge inaccurate reports in court).

On this week’s show, AE chairman Roland Angle discusses not only the Act but also important instances of scientific dispute between professionals and the federal government that the legislation would impact, as well as the recent Chevron ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court curtailing the power of federal agencies.

For 17 years AE911Truth has compiled a mountain of evidence that clearly demonstrates that towers 1, 2, and 7 of the World Trade Center were brought down with explosives on September 11, 2001.

Along with that, we have shined a light on several glaring errors and omissions in the analyses performed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology in their official World Trade Center reports. 
 
Rather than defend its conclusions, NIST has closed the book on its reports and now hides behind the legal claim that, ultimately, federal agencies are not accountable to the American people.

Sadly, the courts have backed NIST up, claiming that it has met its statutory requirements and that it cannot be compelled to issue accurate reports.

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear our appeal of this erroneous logic.  

Political commentator cites Loose Change and the reality of false flag attacks on her podcast.

In only the ninth episode of her podcast, popular conservative commentator Candace Owens expressed doubts about the official narrative of what happened on September 11, 2001.

She cited the film Loose Change and mentioned the “dancing Israelis,” who were arrested in New York City after they were spotted celebrating and videotaping the destruction of the World Trade Center towers.

Scientific Integrity Act would make government accountability part of U.S. law

Earlier this week, AE911Truth announced its groundbreaking new initiative – the Scientific Integrity Act.

This proposed legislation would require scientific reports issued by the federal government to feature data, evidence, and findings that are accurate and true. As well, it would empower all U.S. citizens by giving them standing to challenge inaccurate reports in court.
If passed, the Scientist Integrity Act could prevent another scientific cover-up like the one that protected the official narrative of the World Trade Center destruction.

In this week’s episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele is joined by AE911Truth general manager Kamal Obeid to discuss this important new initiative and how AE911Truth is preparing to wage this important battle for the future of our nation.

How many Americans realize that their own government is allowed to publish scientific reports that are false? And how many know that this is the case even with scientific data that the government knows to be false.

This fact was confirmed in a recent court ruling in a 2023 lawsuit brought by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth against the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The action concerned NIST’s report on the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11, 2001.
AE911Truth sued NIST after the federal agency refused to correct false data and conclusions in its report. AE had raised the issue in the form of a “request for correction,” which NIST failed to respond to in any meaningful way.

Not surprisingly, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with NIST, reaching the conclusion in its October 2023 ruling, which stated that as long as NIST’s report met “statutory requirements,” it did not have to be accurate or true. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the ruling.

But despite losing, AE911Truth is turning the case into an opportunity called the Scientific Integrity Act.