admin – Page 80 – Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

AE911Truth Response to Mark Weitzman of the Simon Wiesenthal Center

December 10, 2007

Richard Gage AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, responds powerfully to the insinuations and defamations put forth by Mark Weitzman of the Simon Wiesenthal Center during his powerpoint presentation in Jane Harman’s congressional committee hearing last fall, HR 1955, Homeland Security Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment, “Using The Web As A Weapon: The Internet As A Tool For Violent Radicalization And Homegrown Terrorism.”

Gage calls for an apology, a retraction and a meeting with Mark Weitzman and/or representatives from the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

Appeal Filed with NIST, Pursuant to Earlier Request for Correction

November 1, 2007

This letter constitutes an appeal of the decisions handed down in the Response, and asks NIST, through its Deputy Director, to reconsider its position on the issues raised in the Request. The particular issues raised in the Request, and addressed in the Response, will be…

Direct Evidence for Explosions: Flying Projectiles and Widespread Impact Damage

August 1, 2007

Introduction: Claims have been made that there is no direct proof that explosions occurred in the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, but there are in fact visible photographs of collapse results that provide that proof. One such photograph posted in late 2005 is shown…

High Velocity Bursts of Debris From Point-Like Sources in the WTC Towers

June 13, 2007

Abstract: This paper aims to bring to light just one specific aspect of the physical evidence, namely, the phenomena known as “demolition squibs”. In actuality, this evidence is better described as high velocity bursts of debris ejected from point-like sources near the exterior facade as…

9/11 Family Members and Scholars: Request for Correction Submitted to NIST

June 1, 2007

Conclusion: For all of the foregoing reasons, we the undersigned Requesters, respectfully request that NIST revise its WTC Report in accordance with the arguments, requests and recommendations contained herein. NIST is hereby advised that if it does not comply with a particular request made herein,…

The Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis for the Destruction of the Twin Towers

May 1, 2007

Abstract: In the past two years there has been an exponential growth in the number of people questioning the explanations we have been given, by official U.S. government bodies, concerning the collapses of the three WTC buildings in NYC on 9/11/2001. It is probably safe…

Revisiting 9/11/2001 – Applying the Scientific Method

May 1, 2007

Introduction: In this paper I focus on the application of the scientific method to the study of what really happened on 9/11/2001, particularly in the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings. There is something here to look at in depth: this is serious business….

Statement Regarding Thermite: Part 1

January 17, 2007

On August 30, 2006 a taxpayer funded entity known as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published responses to what they deemed “frequently asked questions” regarding the demise of World Trade Center building 1, 2 and 7. I will briefly examine some of…

The NIST WTC Investigation–How Real Was The Simulation?

December 1, 2006

Abstract: The NIST investigation of the WTC building failures was extensive, but NIST did not substantiate its conclusions experimentally. On the contrary, many of NIST’s tests contradicted its conclusions. Furthermore, there are several examples in which NIST chose to manipulate input data, and then certify…

Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?

September 1, 2006

Abstract: In this paper, I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11…