Carlson Questions WTC 7 on Alex Stein’s Show

“I know that I and everyone else I knew just sort of went with the official explanation and not only didn’t question it but were very hostile to anyone who did. I was hostile to anyone who did. You know… ‘why are you… you’re crazy! You’re upsetting the survivors by asking questions!’ I said things like that. And I’m ashamed that I did, but I did, and so did everyone else that I knew.”

 

The subject of 9/11 came up while he was being questioned about his recent interview with alternative media mogul, Alex Jones. Carlson, who in the past year has spoken out in support of 9/11 truth, has become bolder in his public assertions that the official story doesn’t add up. 

 

“And moreover, the Building 7 stuff, I’m happy to believe it collapsed because it was hit with debris from the planes or whatever but… I don’t know… I’ve personally known a number of structural engineers who are like ‘that’s not true.’ Now, what is true? I don’t know… I have no evidence. I haven’t seen anybody placing satchel charges in the building… I don’t know. It’s all speculation. But it’s an entirely fair question… it is not crazy… to ask, ‘how did those buildings collapse in the way they did?… Particularly the building that was not hit by a plane?’ Like… what was that?”

 

Though Tucker Carlson has, by his own admission, not delved deeply into researching the World Trade Center evidence, our engineers have, and we can confidently answer his question regarding what it was— controlled demolition. 

 

At 5:20 in the afternoon of September 11, 2001, World Trade Center 7 suddenly and rapidly fell, despite not being hit by an airplane. While the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) later issued a report claiming that the high-rise came down solely because of random office fires, the observable evidence has shown otherwise. 

 

 

In 2020, the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) issued its own report refuting NIST’s claims regarding why Building 7 fell, pointing out that it could only have come down in the way that it did if the exterior and interior columns of the building were removed within seconds of each other. While the UAF report doesn’t delve into the question of how this phenomenon could have occurred, its conclusions leave the use of pre-planted explosives as the only reasonable possibility.