The two longtime researchers present evidence that no 757 impact occurred

To borrow part of a line from Lord Alfred Douglas, it is the evidence that dare not speak its name.

We’re talking about the powerful set of facts concerning what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11 – which the 9/11 Truth Movement has been conditioned to think is “too contentious” and “too controversial” to focus on when challenging the official story. But this week on 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele pushes back on this as he interviews two noted Pentagon researchers who have spent many years arguing that the Pentagon is an essential part of the case against the 9/11 narrative.

Craig McKee steps out of his usual role as co host this week to present the case against the government’s Pentagon story along with explaining why the Truth Movement should not be afraid to address this evidence. He is joined by fellow researcher Adam Ruff in offering a series of photographs and video clips to support the contention that no Boeing 757 ever hit the building on 9/11 and that the U.S. government staged the alleged “damage.”

In the presentation, they present the case:

That highly credible witnesses put the approaching plane on a flight path that was irreconcilable with the alleged damage path
That the damage to the building cannot be the result of the impact of a 90-ton plane flying at 530 mph
That the alleged “wreckage” did not come from a 757 crash
That the “damage” to Lloyde England’s taxi could not have come from a light pole hit by a 757
That the alleged object in the official Pentagon video is not large enough to be a 757

This is an important presentation that no one interested in the 9/11 evidence should miss!

YouTube Thought Police are censoring this video. Shocker! Not. To view these censored thoughts in your country, watch it here on our Rumble backup video library, subscribe and share that version across social media.