... not have melted the WTC steel, suggesting Lee is wrong because the steel didn't need to melt for the buildings to collapse. This is a red herring. Molten metal was seen pouring out of the South Tower for ...
... NIST would later claim that no identifiable steel was recovered from WTC 7, and John Gross would deny the existence of molten metal.
“[T]here is reference often made to a piece of steel from Building ...
The following is a compilation of documented eyewitness accounts of molten metal at the World Trade Center.
Reports from Direct Eyewitnesses
Leslie Robertson, structural engineer for the design ...
... was the molten metal reported under the rubble of the Twin Towers at Ground Zero? And why is the identification of the molten metal important?
Figure 1. The black smoke at the Twin Towers was indicative ...
... 430º C, creating molten iron as a reaction product – characteristics that confirm they are thermitic material and not primer paint.
These XEDS charts show the chemical properties of four red-gray chips ...
It is quite evident that Popular Mechanics has failed to explain away the extreme heat and molten metal that clearly existed at Ground Zero. They have also failed to show the temperatures inside the buildings ...
... the allegedly debunked catchphrase “jet fuel can’t melt steel beams.” Bramesco is evidently unaware, as are most journalists, that there was molten metal both in the rubble and gushing out of the South ...
... are cornered by their own false data, what they do is they just simply lie.
It's like when Shyam Sunder was being interviewed by Allan Reese, and he claimed that the molten metal caught on video falling ...
... make the point that fire isn’t hot enough to melt steel because there was molten metal at Ground Zero, not because the steel needed to melt for the buildings to collapse. This fact, as with all of the ...