One year ago today, the family of Geoffrey Thomas Campbell submitted an application for a fresh inquest into his death in the North Tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

Twenty-one years after his murder, they — and countless other families who lost loved ones — have yet to see the truth come out.

The application they submitted to the attorney general for England and Wales contained around 2,500 pages of evidence showing that the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7 were destroyed with explosives and incendiaries. Included in those 2,500 pages were witness statements from six scientific experts and from five eyewitnesses, four of whom were first responders that day. With the exception of one witness, who has passed away, all are standing by to testify at a future inquest.

There are two questions Attorney General Victoria Prentis (appointed Oct. 25, 2022) needs to answer in deciding whether to grant the Campbell family her authority to apply to the High Court for a fresh inquest. First, was there an “insufficiency of inquiry” into the cause of Mr. Campbell’s death at the first inquest in 2013? Second, in light of the new evidence presented in the application — evidence not heard at the original inquest — is it “necessary or desirable in the interests of justice” for a fresh inquest to be ordered?

If the answer to either of these questions is “yes,” then Attorney General Prentis must grant her authority.

In regards to the first question, the transcript of Mr. Campbell’s 2013 inquest plainly shows that no evidence was heard as to the cause of the North Tower’s destruction. Thus, the coroner’s finding that the airplane impact caused the North Tower’s destruction — and Mr. Campbell’s death — is unsupported.

Moreover, as the Campbell family discovered only last February, the sole material presented to the coroner was a report prepared by the London Metropolitan Police. It contained just two pages summarizing the events of that day, with no evidence — or even assertion — as to the cause of the North Tower’s destruction. In short, the inquiry into the cause of Mr. Campbell’s death was not only insufficient, it was nonexistent.

In regards to the second question, the case law is clear. A family’s wish for a fresh inquest is to be given considerable weight, such that a new inquest may be desirable simply because a family member — in this case, all of Mr. Campbell’s family — requests it.

Further, the mere possibility of a different conclusion is enough to warrant a fresh inquest. The Campbell family does not need to prove to the attorney general that a different conclusion is likely. In fact, it does not even matter whether a different conclusion might be reached. As long as there is new evidence, justice requires that the full extent of that evidence be publicly revealed.

The Campbell family has said they appreciate the painstaking effort the Attorney General’s Office has put into reviewing the application and they look forward to hearing from Attorney General Prentis in due course. They have every expectation that they will have their day in the West London Coroner’s Court, where the true cause of Geoff Campbell’s death on 9/11 will be proven.

Watch the Campbell family submit their application one year ago in the final minutes of AE911Truth’s feature documentary The Unspeakable.

Note: This article was updated to reflect the appointment of Victoria Prentis to the position of attorney general for England and Wales on October 25, 2022.

Related News

Why Are We Now Being Warned That a New 9/11 is On the Way?

New claims come amid increasing challenges to 9/11 official story
Read More...

Gage, Obeid, and Schuler React to Rotanz Interview

Gage, engineers Obeid, and Schuler have questions
Read More...

They Saw This Coming. Now It’s Worse Than Ever.

They’re terrified of you seeing this.
Read More...

AE911Truth Launches Digital Archive to Preserve Essential 9/11 Evidence

Growing censorship threatens the legacy of truth unearthed since 9/11
Read More...

The Man Inside Building 7: Richard Rotanz on his Role at Ground Zero

9/11 Free Fall: Rotanz calls for new 9/11 investigation
Read More...

Johnson Shows in Carlson Interview that he’s Learning Fast About 9/11

Carlson feels guilty because he was ‘part of the cover-up’
Read More...

Congressman Weldon issues Memorial Day Message

Yesterday, a day before Memorial Day, former Congressman Curt Weldon posted the following message via LinkedIn...
Read More...

Lt. Colonel Anthony Shaffer Post Show/Able Danger/AI Fakes/Police Agents

The AE Crew Talks AI Fakes, Able Danger, and Whether or Not They’re ‘Police Agents’
Read More...

James Corbett on elite control and the New World Order

The popular podcaster discusses his new book on 9/11 Free Fall
Read More...

Deconstructing Media Disinfo Tactics against Ron Johnson

Numerous hit pieces use the same manipulative attacks
Read More...

Jimmy Dore Goes to School on WTC Controlled Demolition

Richard Gage and Kamal Obeid deliver the essential evidence
Read More...

Richard Gage and AE Reunite to Make History

AE & RichardGage911 Partner to Bring 9/11Truth to the World Stage
Read More...

Establishment Media Dip into Usual Bag of Tricks to Attack Johnson

Wisconsin senator believes in controlled demolition of Building 7
Read More...

Wisconsin Senator Backs WTC Demolition!

Ron Johnson of Wisconsin will work with Weldon to get a new investigation
Read More...

Gage, Obeid react to massive impact of Weldon/Carlson interview

AE911Truth’s founder and new chairman share their insights
Read More...

Game-changer? Weldon/Carlson interview reaching millions

Podcasters Russell Brand and Benny Johnson join those commenting on controlled demolition
Read More...

AE911Truth Staff Remembers Roland Angle

Special podcast looks at the chairman’s legacy
Read More...

The quiet but essential legacy of Roland Angle

His book on the engineering cover-up of 9/11 will be published
Read More...

WSJ Article Links 9/11 Truth to ‘Ultraconservatism’ and Russia Support

American who helped Russian army against Ukraine supposedly inspired by Loose Change
Read More...

Richard & Gail Gage on 9/11 Free Fall

Coalition of the best of the 9/11 research movement against the unelected, entrenched shadow government
Read More...

Retired OEM Deputy Commissioner Joins Call for New 9/11 Investigation

Richard Rotanz saw an elevator that had been blown out of its shaft in Building 7
Read More...

9/11 coalition creates document outlining WTC evidence for President Trump

Evidence overview will be submitted by former congressman Curt Weldon
Read More...

As engineers, we have a legal responsibility to guard the public’s safety.

We are a small non-profit taking on a tremendous issue, and we need your support to help fund these efforts.

If you believe in the power of dedicated people and their ability to change the world, then please make a donation right now!

Thank you so much for your continued support and your willingness to stand with us! 

 

 

From Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth and filmmaker, Dylan Avery comes this short documentary that is both hauntingly beautiful in its presentation and startlingly grim in its revelations. 


Join civil engineer, Jonathan Cole through an informational odyssey as he revisits the controversy surrounding the impossible destruction of towers 1, 2 and 7 on September 11th 2001, and how his research, along with the research of others, has pulled the rug out from under the conclusions offered by the federal government on why those three buildings ultimately failed. 

Through Cole's testimony, and that of mechanical engineer, Tony Szamboti, a dark picture comes into focus that demonstrates that not only is the official story of what killed so many people on America's darkest day provably false but that the federal government actively and willfully turned a blind eye to the observable facts during its unscientific investigation of the building collapses. 

In a little over twenty minutes, Thirty Seconds of Silence reveals more about the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11 than the media has revealed to the public in the over twenty years since the event took place.