The bedrock of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is our petition demanding a new and independent investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11.

In May, this petition surpassed the remarkable milestone of 3,000 architects and engineers. As we announced then, we are marking this significant achievement with the upcoming publication of 3,000 Architects & Engineers: In Their Own Words, a handsomely designed document that will list every signatory along with his or her statement of support, academic degree, and technical biography.

In the meantime, we would like to honor and highlight just a few of the architects and engineers who most recently added their voices to the call for a new investigation and propelled us to the 3,000 milestone. We encourage you to share these testimonials with any architects and engineers you may know and ask them to also sign the AE911Truth petition.


“An unbiased and scientific analysis is required due to inconsistencies on many fronts.”
— James Watkins, B.S. Civil Engineering. Engineer in Training (EIT) and eight-year army veteran (Iraq 2007 – 2009, Afghanistan 2009 – 2010).

“The NIST model [of WTC 7] does not represent the reality of the collapse. Therefore, NIST model assumptions were wrong somewhere. In addition to that, the collapse of one major column would not cause the whole building to collapse, and if it did, it will not collapse symmetrically.”
— Amin Talha, architect with 30 years of experience managing the construction of institutional, commercial, and residential high-rise buildings and single-family dwellings.

“Real investigations by the National Transportation Safety Board, Chemical Safety Board, etc., are thorough and to the highest ethical and professional standards — using all available evidence to arrive at logical, science-based conclusions. This type of investigation has yet to occur for the events of 9/11. The current dubious conclusions of the 9/11 investigation require cherry-picked evidence, a secret model that is off limits to peer review, and exclusion of contradictory evidence. The process used was anything but scientific.”
— Daniel Lambesis, chemical engineer with over 30 years of experience in the chemical industry.

“The manner of free-fall collapse of all the structures required removal of all structural support and the horizontal expelled matter required an introduced horizontal force.”
— Frankie Lee, P.E., engineering consultant with over 30 years of experience on construction-related projects and 20 years of working as a civil engineer.

“The official version of the events of 9/11 never made sense to me but, for some reason, I chose to ignore or dismiss my suspicions for 16 years. I am ready now to throw my weight behind the call for a new investigation.”
— Kevin Giambrone, P.E., structural engineer with expertise in bridges.

“[T]here are so many inconsistencies in the official reports on the tragic event and so many gaps, especially in the collapse of WTC 7, that only a new, independent investigation can confirm or delete suspicions and remove existing ambiguities. I therefore fully agree with the request to have the events re-examined independently.”
— Joerg Schneider, Professor Emeritus of Structural Engineering at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, former President of the Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS), and Vice President of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE).

Related News

Gage, Obeid, and Schuler React to Rotanz Interview

Gage, engineers Obeid, and Schuler have questions
Read More...

They Saw This Coming. Now It’s Worse Than Ever.

They’re terrified of you seeing this.
Read More...

AE911Truth Launches Digital Archive to Preserve Essential 9/11 Evidence

Growing censorship threatens the legacy of truth unearthed since 9/11
Read More...

The Man Inside Building 7: Richard Rotanz on his Role at Ground Zero

9/11 Free Fall: Rotanz calls for new 9/11 investigation
Read More...

Johnson Shows in Carlson Interview that he’s Learning Fast About 9/11

Carlson feels guilty because he was ‘part of the cover-up’
Read More...

Congressman Weldon issues Memorial Day Message

Yesterday, a day before Memorial Day, former Congressman Curt Weldon posted the following message via LinkedIn...
Read More...

Lt. Colonel Anthony Shaffer Post Show/Able Danger/AI Fakes/Police Agents

The AE Crew Talks AI Fakes, Able Danger, and Whether or Not They’re ‘Police Agents’
Read More...

James Corbett on elite control and the New World Order

The popular podcaster discusses his new book on 9/11 Free Fall
Read More...

Deconstructing Media Disinfo Tactics against Ron Johnson

Numerous hit pieces use the same manipulative attacks
Read More...

Jimmy Dore Goes to School on WTC Controlled Demolition

Richard Gage and Kamal Obeid deliver the essential evidence
Read More...

Richard Gage and AE Reunite to Make History

AE & RichardGage911 Partner to Bring 9/11Truth to the World Stage
Read More...

Establishment Media Dip into Usual Bag of Tricks to Attack Johnson

Wisconsin senator believes in controlled demolition of Building 7
Read More...

Wisconsin Senator Backs WTC Demolition!

Ron Johnson of Wisconsin will work with Weldon to get a new investigation
Read More...

Gage, Obeid react to massive impact of Weldon/Carlson interview

AE911Truth’s founder and new chairman share their insights
Read More...

Game-changer? Weldon/Carlson interview reaching millions

Podcasters Russell Brand and Benny Johnson join those commenting on controlled demolition
Read More...

AE911Truth Staff Remembers Roland Angle

Special podcast looks at the chairman’s legacy
Read More...

The quiet but essential legacy of Roland Angle

His book on the engineering cover-up of 9/11 will be published
Read More...

Roland Angle 1942-2025

The passing of Roland Angle
Read More...

Firefighters Convention Offers Article on Weldon Project

Print version of piece on Building 7 will also be available
Read More...

Richard & Gail Gage on 9/11 Free Fall

Coalition of the best of the 9/11 research movement against the unelected, entrenched shadow government
Read More...

Retired OEM Deputy Commissioner Joins Call for New 9/11 Investigation

Richard Rotanz saw an elevator that had been blown out of its shaft in Building 7
Read More...

9/11 coalition creates document outlining WTC evidence for President Trump

Evidence overview will be submitted by former congressman Curt Weldon
Read More...

As engineers, we have a legal responsibility to guard the public’s safety.

We are a small non-profit taking on a tremendous issue, and we need your support to help fund these efforts.

If you believe in the power of dedicated people and their ability to change the world, then please make a donation right now!

Thank you so much for your continued support and your willingness to stand with us! 

 

 

From Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth and filmmaker, Dylan Avery comes this short documentary that is both hauntingly beautiful in its presentation and startlingly grim in its revelations. 


Join civil engineer, Jonathan Cole through an informational odyssey as he revisits the controversy surrounding the impossible destruction of towers 1, 2 and 7 on September 11th 2001, and how his research, along with the research of others, has pulled the rug out from under the conclusions offered by the federal government on why those three buildings ultimately failed. 

Through Cole's testimony, and that of mechanical engineer, Tony Szamboti, a dark picture comes into focus that demonstrates that not only is the official story of what killed so many people on America's darkest day provably false but that the federal government actively and willfully turned a blind eye to the observable facts during its unscientific investigation of the building collapses. 

In a little over twenty minutes, Thirty Seconds of Silence reveals more about the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11 than the media has revealed to the public in the over twenty years since the event took place.