• Home
  • NEWS
  • Authors of censored 9/11 paper appeal latest unethical rejection by ASCE journal

Authors of censored 9/11 paper appeal latest unethical rejection by ASCE journal

Refusing to back down after more than a decade of fighting to have their hugely important paper published in the ASCE’s Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Tony Szamboti and Richard Johns earlier today submitted an appeal in response to the journal’s latest unethical rejection of their paper.

First submitted in 2011 and inexplicably rejected as “out of scope” in 2013, the censored discussion paper refutes a highly influential paper co-authored by engineering professor Zdeněk Bažant that purports to explain how, through gravity alone, the top of the North Tower could crush through the lower structure at almost free-fall acceleration without observably slowing down.

For more on this development, we invite you to read Szamboti and Johns’ appeal letter and to watch Ted Walter’s latest update on this important story. Walter, who remains optimistic that the paper will one day be published, also responds to debunker-in-chief Mick West’s recent head-scratching claim that Zdeněk Bažant’s analysis is not foundational to the official story of 9/11.

As engineers, we have a legal responsibility to guard the public’s safety.

We are a small non-profit taking on a tremendous issue, and we need your support to help fund these efforts.

If you believe in the power of dedicated people and their ability to change the world, then please make a donation right now!

Thank you so much for your continued support and your willingness to stand with us! 

 

 

From Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth and filmmaker, Dylan Avery comes this short documentary that is both hauntingly beautiful in its presentation and startlingly grim in its revelations. 


Join civil engineer, Jonathan Cole through an informational odyssey as he revisits the controversy surrounding the impossible destruction of towers 1, 2 and 7 on September 11th 2001, and how his research, along with the research of others, has pulled the rug out from under the conclusions offered by the federal government on why those three buildings ultimately failed. 

Through Cole's testimony, and that of mechanical engineer, Tony Szamboti, a dark picture comes into focus that demonstrates that not only is the official story of what killed so many people on America's darkest day provably false but that the federal government actively and willfully turned a blind eye to the observable facts during its unscientific investigation of the building collapses. 

In a little over twenty minutes, Thirty Seconds of Silence reveals more about the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11 than the media has revealed to the public in the over twenty years since the event took place.